Are there significant security issues with the new "systemd init" system?
Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Well, the only constructive thing that could be said or done, since this software by now is very widely used, is to "get involved" with the project, make a case for what should be done better (without "going back to init" ...), make the change and "sell" it to the team, and then ...
... uhh ... put on your flameproof bunny-suit as, in time, your work is also roundingly criticized in public.
Distribution: debian 9.8 w/GNOME and KDE dual boot w/Win 10.| debian 7.11 w/Xfce, LFS 7.9, + Multi-boot w/Windows7
Posts: 122
Rep:
Wow, with systemd, It is almost like when I mention anything, no matter how really (unintentionally) unrelated to weight or age
with my spouse.. the war starts oO
Personally, I believe in the UNIX/Linux axiom of do one thing and do it well.
(and not force dependency but be compatible)
Just my $.02.
Last edited by Tim Abracadabra; 05-27-2016 at 08:36 PM.
Reason: fix typo intentionally to unintentionally, lol
And it's just that and nothing more. Not to the point and not in response to what the OP really asked for (any security problems with Systemd).
Plus I already asked all to please keep this thread on topic.
So not reading a thread is not a valid argument.
If someone told me there's a flaw, I'd instantly forget about it. Just like a windows flaw, it's irrelevant to me.
Flaw in the kernel I'd probably report, but some things are better off being left alone, so I'd just ignore it and move on.
Life's too short to waste time on pointless arguments, and what software is valuable to some is vaporware to other, this will not change.
$0.02 or something.
My toasters not secure, anyone can just stick bread in there!
If I need an old system (add: or want something specific) to work I'll run it like an old system(*). Otherwise (not looking under the hood here too often (well Sid so)) things run fine, thanks!
Last edited by jamison20000e; 06-01-2016 at 11:18 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.