Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I want full permissions for all computers in my house, without having to get up and go to the other room and change permissions for the file, folder, drive, directory, computer, etc., then go back to the other room again.
I just created a partition, as THIS user, THIS machine, rebooted, and cannot create a folder on the partition I just created. UGH. No more of this stuff... I guess at the very least, I'll still have to log onto each machine for this?
It's not totally clear what problem you are trying to solve.
First, root privileges are pretty much independent of remote configuration---eg, you need remote access for the latter, regardless of what changes you are making.
Why not "su" to root when you want to change something? And, as needed, log into the other machines using SSH.
It's not totally clear what problem you are trying to solve.
First, root privileges are pretty much independent of remote configuration---eg, you need remote access for the latter, regardless of what changes you are making.
Why not "su" to root when you want to change something? And, as needed, log into the other machines using SSH.
Trying to solve?
Except for an occasional prompt for a password, I want NO questions asked. None. Ever - for ANYthing. Folder creation permission, file read/write permission, etc., etc., etc.
Playing '20 Questions' is for customer service for the bank, or tech support, or calling the doctor's office, etc. I'm just not into the same game with all my computers.
Anybody with ideas about these permissions/privileges?
Last edited by buccaneere; 06-05-2010 at 05:05 PM.
groupadd - Linux Command - Unix Command - [ Diese Seite übersetzen ]Linux / Unix Command Library: groupadd. Learn about its synopsis, description, options, and examples.
linux.about.com/od/.../l/blcmdl8_groupad.htm - Im Cache - Ähnliche
somehow there could be the group root
and add user to the group root
Are you the only user, is your house locked and alarmed, AND do you avoid keeping any sensitve info on the machines? If "yes" to all three, then just run as the root user. Otherwise, I would recommend sticking with normal procedures.
cannot create a folder on the partition I just created. UGH. No more of this stuff...
That's mount permissions and no reason for requiring unprivileged users to have root privileges all of the time. Need root account privileges for unprivileged user ops? Use Sudo. Else use the "wheel" group (or /etc/suauth where applicable) if you want to weaken security by allowing an unprivileged user to 'su' to root. Do note this is not about choice, freedom or personal preference but about basic OS architecture as it was derived from UNIX: please use GNU/Linux as it is intended to be used.
Last edited by unSpawn; 06-05-2010 at 07:42 PM.
Reason: //More *is* more
Good advice. Sounds like something Microsoft would say. Or government.
Taking into account your previous threads it's remarkable to find you even took the time to reply. And your response perfectly shows that people know what they want but only few know what they need.
Good advice. Sounds like something Microsoft would say. Or government.
Just out of curiosity, are you pro gun, or anti gun? You don't have to answer if you don't want...
In this house, I'm the only user. Digital BOSS Uh hUH.
Perhaps logging in as root user, which is a pain - log out, log back in - IS MORE SECURE, since networking is disabled when logging in as root user.
That was not a bad idea by developers...
Since when is security a bad idea? And what distro has no network access as root? If you wanted there is no reason you couldn't run as root 100% of the time (other than the security implications) and never create an unprivileged account.
I still don't get what it is you are trying to do that you need admin rights all the time. If you want to have an easy sharing setup just mount that partition on a folder that has chmod 777. Once a system is up and running with all the partitions/folders setup, software installed there should really not be any prompts for normal usage.
// NOTE FROM MODERATOR:
// Please don't post these type of comments, as they threaten to derail/ignite the thread.
// Feel free to contact me via email if you need to discuss this. --win32sux
Last edited by win32sux; 06-06-2010 at 06:00 PM.
Reason: Removed non-constructive comment.
If you are having permission problems on remote shares, my guess is that you don't have permissions and ownerships configured correctly. If you are using NFS to share directories between computers, you may not be using the same UID for your regular user between the computers.
Using the "user" mount option, for example, you would be able to mount an NFS share as a regular user. You need to be the owner to enter the mounted share. If you have an external FAT32 or NTFS drive, using UUID=<the uuid #> in /etc/fstab along with the uid=, gid= and the user option, you can mount it as a regular user and have the ownership and permissions set properly.
The helmet is part of the upper arms in heraldry .
Helm (Heraldik) – Wikipedia
- [ Translate this page ] [NON-ENGLISH CONTENT REMOVED BY MODERATOR]
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helm_(Heraldik) - Cached - Similar
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.