Linux - NewsThis forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
sneckfilter
Okay so let me throw an idea in the ring that I've had in my head for some time. If price is one of the main advantages linux has over Windows, what would happen if Microsoft were to release say, XP Starter Edition completely free of charge across the world. Download only say but that would blow the whole model out of the water, wouldn't it?
I don't think price is a major consideration for most people using Linux. After all, most pc's come with Windows preinstalled and bundled software.
I personally wouldn't accept the Microsoft EULA and their intrusion into my pc if they paid me. Well, I would, but it would have to be a substantial sum :-)
I think the main reasons for using Linux are curiousity, flexibility, security and dissatisfaction with Windows. A free XP woldn't affect these.
If MS made a version of windows that was secure, standars-compliant, easy to develop for, stable, fast, and everything linux has, and then they offered it for free, I might use it. The thing keeping me back would be its closed source.
Originally posted by dyw If MS made a version of windows that was secure, standars-compliant, easy to develop for, stable, fast, and everything linux has, and then they offered it for free, I might use it. The thing keeping me back would be its closed source.
Yeah, but there is one more thing that makes me choose Linux before Windows. And that is how the Linux community works. In Linux you can choose to set up your own system. I start with a custom installation of slackware and fluxbox. And from there I put together different programs to end up with a fully customized system that feels very individual. I don't get that feeling from Windows. Here I feel that this is MY system with MY setup. I windows it's just Microsoft all the way.
another few things I love about Linux over Windows:
Versatility in Purpose. Linux functions great as a desktop, a server, and there are PDA implementations. Windows is a desktop OS at best, it isn't a great server OS.
Power. Before I came to linux, who knew about X? "Did you say you could let a computer display control windows of applications running remotely?" and same thing w/ arts.
The community!!!
The vast amount of Free Software available for it, all ready for you to modify if you need to...
Anybody care to add more? There must be hundreds...
Oh I wouldn't count on it... Selling services online? How about a basic OS to get you started... Lovely vendor lock-in before you can say "proprietary hell". Here's the reasons why they may just do it
1. Seriously damages linux credibility as "a cheaper OS"
2. Responds to criticism over security - patches available to everyone
3. Provides everyone with a free OS that they can then sell services on top for
I'm sure there's plenty more. They can certainly afford to do it. How much money do they honestly make off Home Edition as a % of their net income - I'd love to know.
EDIT: Oh help - I've just realised that my 666th post is me talking about a free MS OS!!! Now I KNOW I'm going to hell.....
It's being released in Asian countries, where software piracy runs rampant. I think this is Micro$soft's attempt to coerce people in those nations to purchase legal copies of Windows XP. They probably figured that if they can't stop the piracy, they can do something to make legit XP more attractive (lower the price). The article mentioned that M$ was working with the local governments on this project, so that, to me, supports the idea that they are doing this as a move against piracy of their OS in those areas. I wouldn't doubt that this article was heavily influeced by M$ spin doctors, along with the people quoted in the article.
It's all about control...to turn a human being...into this: <insert image of M$ butterfly>.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.