LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News
User Name
Password
Linux - News This forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-19-2005, 08:10 AM   #16
ahh
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 293

Rep: Reputation: 31

Quote:
sneckfilter
Okay so let me throw an idea in the ring that I've had in my head for some time. If price is one of the main advantages linux has over Windows, what would happen if Microsoft were to release say, XP Starter Edition completely free of charge across the world. Download only say but that would blow the whole model out of the water, wouldn't it?
I don't think price is a major consideration for most people using Linux. After all, most pc's come with Windows preinstalled and bundled software.

I personally wouldn't accept the Microsoft EULA and their intrusion into my pc if they paid me. Well, I would, but it would have to be a substantial sum :-)

I think the main reasons for using Linux are curiousity, flexibility, security and dissatisfaction with Windows. A free XP woldn't affect these.
 
Old 02-19-2005, 10:19 PM   #17
dyw
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15
If MS made a version of windows that was secure, standars-compliant, easy to develop for, stable, fast, and everything linux has, and then they offered it for free, I might use it. The thing keeping me back would be its closed source.
 
Old 02-20-2005, 07:49 AM   #18
Ephracis
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 1,109

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 50
Quote:
Originally posted by dyw
If MS made a version of windows that was secure, standars-compliant, easy to develop for, stable, fast, and everything linux has, and then they offered it for free, I might use it. The thing keeping me back would be its closed source.
Yeah, but there is one more thing that makes me choose Linux before Windows. And that is how the Linux community works. In Linux you can choose to set up your own system. I start with a custom installation of slackware and fluxbox. And from there I put together different programs to end up with a fully customized system that feels very individual. I don't get that feeling from Windows. Here I feel that this is MY system with MY setup. I windows it's just Microsoft all the way.
 
Old 02-21-2005, 01:39 PM   #19
Tuttle
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Wellington, NZ
Distribution: mainly slackware
Posts: 1,291

Rep: Reputation: 52
If microsoft released a free version of windows, I'd download it, install it, install all my games on it and then reboot into linux.
 
Old 02-21-2005, 04:07 PM   #20
pnellesen
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Missouri, USA
Distribution: Slackware 12.2, Xubuntu 9.10
Posts: 371

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally posted by MezzyMeat
Haha, yeah. The same for my apartment. And it has just been great since I left Windows one year ago.
Up to 75% in my house. Can't convince the missus to move off XP, unfortunately
 
Old 02-21-2005, 05:27 PM   #21
dyw
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15
another few things I love about Linux over Windows:
  • Versatility in Purpose. Linux functions great as a desktop, a server, and there are PDA implementations. Windows is a desktop OS at best, it isn't a great server OS.
  • Power. Before I came to linux, who knew about X? "Did you say you could let a computer display control windows of applications running remotely?" and same thing w/ arts.
  • The community!!!
  • The vast amount of Free Software available for it, all ready for you to modify if you need to...
  • Anybody care to add more? There must be hundreds...
 
Old 02-27-2005, 01:29 AM   #22
cscott
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Distribution: Gentoo, Mandrake 10.1 Official
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 15
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally posted by pnellesen
Up to 75% in my house. Can't convince the missus to move off XP, unfortunately
Divorce her
 
Old 03-09-2005, 01:46 PM   #23
mikolo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lithuania, Vilnius
Distribution: Suse 9.2
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: 0
Microsoft will never realese free Windows version.
 
Old 03-09-2005, 01:57 PM   #24
snecklifter
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: UK/West Yorkshire/Huddersfield
Distribution: Fedora 7
Posts: 982

Rep: Reputation: 30
Oh I wouldn't count on it... Selling services online? How about a basic OS to get you started... Lovely vendor lock-in before you can say "proprietary hell". Here's the reasons why they may just do it

1. Seriously damages linux credibility as "a cheaper OS"
2. Responds to criticism over security - patches available to everyone
3. Provides everyone with a free OS that they can then sell services on top for

I'm sure there's plenty more. They can certainly afford to do it. How much money do they honestly make off Home Edition as a % of their net income - I'd love to know.

EDIT: Oh help - I've just realised that my 666th post is me talking about a free MS OS!!! Now I KNOW I'm going to hell.....
 
Old 03-09-2005, 02:23 PM   #25
dyw
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by mikolo
Microsoft will never realese free Windows version.
They already have released a cheap one - http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/p...terPilotPR.asp
 
Old 03-09-2005, 03:23 PM   #26
drowbot
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa, OK, USA
Distribution: SUSE, ArchLinux, Gentoo, LFS, Slackware, Fedora
Posts: 100

Rep: Reputation: 15
It's being released in Asian countries, where software piracy runs rampant. I think this is Micro$soft's attempt to coerce people in those nations to purchase legal copies of Windows XP. They probably figured that if they can't stop the piracy, they can do something to make legit XP more attractive (lower the price). The article mentioned that M$ was working with the local governments on this project, so that, to me, supports the idea that they are doing this as a move against piracy of their OS in those areas. I wouldn't doubt that this article was heavily influeced by M$ spin doctors, along with the people quoted in the article.

It's all about control...to turn a human being...into this: <insert image of M$ butterfly>.

= ]
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
virus attack on linux beats24 Linux - Security 1 12-01-2005 09:14 AM
Linux Advisory Watch: March 25th 2005 [from LinuxSecurity.com] t3gah Linux - Security 1 03-27-2005 12:37 AM
PCLinuxOS vs Knoppix: Linux Format March 2005 davecs Linux - Distributions 0 03-16-2005 02:35 PM
Why don't viruses attack Linux ? linuxprogrammer Linux - Security 13 10-23-2004 05:40 AM
March 31 with the release of Red Hat Linux 9, code-named Shrike. futurist Linux - Distributions 1 03-26-2003 02:11 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration