Latest LQ Deal: Linux Power User Bundle
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News
User Name
Linux - News This forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.


  Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2013, 02:23 PM   #1
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 12,434

Rep: Reputation: 3312Reputation: 3312Reputation: 3312Reputation: 3312Reputation: 3312Reputation: 3312Reputation: 3312Reputation: 3312Reputation: 3312Reputation: 3312Reputation: 3312
Itís back: District court judge revives SCO v IBM

Decade-old lawsuit exhumed in response to SCO motion for reconsideration.

Sad that Game of Thrones has wrapped up its third season? Looking for some drama to fill the time? We've got just the thing for you. One of the Internet's longest-running and most-hated lawsuits is back: SCO v. IBM has been reopened by Utah district court judge David Nuffer.

The case stretches back ten years to March 2003, when the SCO Group filed a massive $1 billion suit against IBM for allegedly contributing sections of commercial UNIX code from UNIX System V, which the SCO Group (allegedly) owned, to the Linux kernel's codebase. SCO Group claimed that the alleged presence of its proprietary code in the open source kernel devalued its proprietary code and that by making the source code available, IBM had violated its license agreement with SCO Group.

From there, the case spawned other cases and quickly ballooned to a truly ridiculous size and scope. The SCO Group demanded royalties from major companies using Linux and filed suit against several (including DaimlerChrysler and AutoZone. Novell stepped in, asserting that it actually held the copyright to the code SCO Group claimed was infringing, which then spun off into its own major lawsuit. Groklaw has an excellent and intricate timeline of the entire mess.

Throughout the case, SCO Group maintained three central claims: first, that it owned System V code that had been illegally used in the Linux kernel; second, that anyone who used Linux owed them money; and third, because the infringing code was proprietary, SCO refused to actually identify any of the code except under a highly restrictive NDA.
More at Ars...



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Oracle v. Google judge asks for comment on EU court ruling LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 05-05-2012 07:14 AM
LXer: SCO vs. Linux: From the Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-14-2010 06:50 AM
LXer: Low-cost Linux revives IBM mainframe (again) LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-14-2007 11:20 AM
LXer: Judge Deals SCO Setback In Lawsuit Against IBM About Linux Code LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-02-2006 12:03 AM
LXer: SCO fails to mention IBM ruling to Red Hat Judge LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-07-2006 10:54 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration