![]() |
You can use either Testing or Bullseye in sources.list. If you use Bullseye, you will move to Stable when Bullseye replaces Buster as Stable. If you use Testing, you will stay on Testing when Bullseye becomes Stable, switching to whatever the next release name is. It's a choice you make, and either is fine, depending on your preferences.
|
You learn something every day :)
So can I set my sources to Buster so I can get working versions of these programs? This would hopefully prevent my wanting to reinstall stable. Debian also seems to suggest this... Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Again commenting on my own question, it seems it can be done but not simply.
|
Quote:
|
I would strongly suggest adding backports instead of switching to Testing. Testing breaks, sometimes for a week or more. IMO Unstable is better for most users than Testing. I run Sid (Unstable) on most of my machines, but I have more than one available, and one runs Stable, just in case. If Sid breaks, it's only for a day or two, and I can live with that. The thing you should never do is to mix multiple versions on one computer, other than backports. Do not have both Stable and Testing in your sources.list. Run one or the other, but not both. You will have borkage sooner or later, and probably sooner. Pick one and stick with it. In your situation I would use Stable with backports, and add only the backported packages that i really needed. Mostly you only need the kernel and associated firmware.
|
1 Attachment(s)
I now have stable and I have 5.8.0 and X.
I have software rendering. I can't see a reason in the boot messages. |
You need the mesa drivers from backports. Specifically, the i915 driver.
xserver-xorg-video-intel and firmware-misc-nonfree. |
Thanks, I have those already.
Code:
sudo apt install -t buster-backports firmware-misc-nonfree Code:
sudo apt install -t buster-backports xserver-xorg-video-intel |
Do you have mesa-va-drivers installed? That's what gives the hardware acceleration. I overlooked that earlier.
|
Yes, I have mesa-va-drivers.
Code:
lspci | grep VGA Code:
find /dev -group video Code:
glxinfo | grep -i vendor Code:
lsmod | grep "kms\|drm" Code:
cat /proc/cmdline Code:
find /etc/modprobe.d/ Code:
glxinfo | grep -i "vendor\|rendering" Code:
grep LoadModule /var/log/Xorg.0.log |
Well, I'm out of ideas. I've never used Cinnamon, so I have no advice for that. I'm not sure why you're getting that error message,
Are you running this in a VM? I'm not sure it's possible to get hardware rendering in one. I don't use VMware. Your glxinfo output says the vendor is VMware, and it should be Intel. |
No VM, host or client. I guess I'll try another desktop environment. Thanks all the same ;)
Say I do, and it has this problem but doesn't tell me. I'd like to be able to confirm it other than moving a window around and looking for tearing? |
I don't think it really matters, as long as it works. Your glxinfo output says it's using direct rendering. If you're not doing serious gaming or video editing, I doubt you would see any difference either way. But you probably should look further, because I'm far from an expert on computer video.
|
Quote:
As I understand, Glamor acceleration maps 2D operations onto OpenGL. It uses Mesa and LLVM. I would have gone with the working bullseye installation. Ed |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM. |