Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
02-27-2017, 05:23 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2012
Distribution: Ubuntu, SUSE, Redhat
Posts: 188
Rep:
|
why when i change the partition table the data above stays intact?
Hi all
I got this ubuntu 16.04 VM that I am learning about gdisk on. I created a 1G img file and mounted it on a folder and it works. I can write to the folders and read etc.
Then I decided to change the partition block size from 2M to 4M just for kicks. I had expected that to cause problems such as data loss or corruption. But I can still read and write from my test files. I thought since partition is how the blocks on the disk is allocated, but if I change that, shouldn't that negatively affect the files on top?
Thanks
|
|
|
02-27-2017, 07:04 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 26,472
|
How did you create the image file, what filesystem did you format it as and how did you change the partition block size?
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
02-27-2017, 07:52 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2009
Distribution: Rocky Linux
Posts: 4,804
|
Where and how did you change the "partition block size"? There is no such field in either the GUID or legacy MBR partition table, so what did you change?
|
|
|
02-27-2017, 10:36 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2012
Distribution: Ubuntu, SUSE, Redhat
Posts: 188
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi
I did the following:
Code:
dd if=/dev/zero of=test.img bs=1M count=1000
mkfs.ext3 test.img
fdisk test.img
|
|
|
02-28-2017, 04:19 AM
|
#5
|
Moderator
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 26,472
|
No, the bs option specifies the number of bytes the dd command reads/writes at a time and is not the block size of the filesystem. You can change that when you create the filesystem via the mkfs command but the system knows the value when it is mounted.
It is possible to create a partition table and filesystems within a loop file but it is a bit more complicated.
Last edited by michaelk; 02-28-2017 at 06:01 AM.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|