Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!


  Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2005, 10:13 AM   #1
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 61

Rep: Reputation: 15
Why use ReiserFS?

I've seen people annoyed at ReiserFS, but some people say it's better. Which is true and why?
Old 01-15-2005, 10:30 AM   #2
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1984Reputation: 1984Reputation: 1984Reputation: 1984Reputation: 1984Reputation: 1984Reputation: 1984Reputation: 1984Reputation: 1984Reputation: 1984Reputation: 1984
most users will never notice any real difference between their two likely cohoices of filesytem, ext3 and reisferfs. both do journalling and work very well, however as life sucks, both can break in theory. people that moan about reiserfs are more than likely to have just been unlucky enough to have a bad experience. 70% of my partitions are reiserfs now, the rest on ext3, and they are both fine in my opinion. Reiserfs is a lot newer than the core of ext3 which is based upon the existing ext2 non-journalling code, so theoretically you should get better performance fronm reiserfs with large numbers of files, but none that you are honestly likely to notice on a normal system.
Old 01-15-2005, 04:34 PM   #3
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Brabant, the Netherlands
Distribution: Gentoo 2004.x (2.6.10 hardened)
Posts: 91

Rep: Reputation: 15
I agree with acid_kewpie, I use ReiserFS for anything but the root partition, and I never notice a difference from ext2 / ext3, but there's one thing I should say:

I once screwed up a reiserfs-partition with 3500 mp3's. Well, I didn't, Windows did I think, since it don't understands reiserfs and don't understands I want it to keep it f*lthy hands of it, but anyway, my partition-table disappeared, and I'd to recover the partition.
It had to rebuild it file-tree from scratch, wich for some files failed, and they were lost.

Not a great problem, but the recovering tool (reiserfsck) was kinda like beta.
So finally I lost 500 mp3s and wondered if I'd still have them if I'd used ext3.
Old 01-15-2005, 05:33 PM   #4
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 87
Ditto here. My main distro is Slack, and my secondary distro is Suse, and both of them use reiserfs as the default file system. From my point of view, if Patrick thinks reiser is the right choice to use with Slack, I'm sure as heck not going to argue with him. Just my 2 cents -- J.W.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An odd reiserfs booting problem in a special situation may be about SUSE10's reiserfs ayal Linux - Newbie 7 11-15-2005 07:36 AM
Can you convert Reiserfs 3 to Reiserfs 4 JSylvia007 Linux - Distributions 1 08-19-2004 03:01 PM
Add ReiserFS package destroys non-ReiserFS partitions smirk Mandriva 0 03-24-2004 07:20 PM
Reiserfs Uchiha sasuke Linux - General 9 11-04-2003 02:58 AM
reiserfs juby Linux - Software 5 06-24-2003 06:30 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration