Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!


  Search this Thread
Old 04-04-2005, 06:31 AM   #1
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2005
Distribution: Slackware_10.0
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
why swithcing to a new kernel

The reason of my tread is that ereryone talks about choosing a new kernel and i do not understand why, what does a newer kernel provide, it is faster ?

Can someone explain this to me?
Old 04-04-2005, 06:52 AM   #2
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 245Reputation: 245Reputation: 245
I only upgrade when there are security vulnerability fixes or patches and or I have hardware that will work with a newer release or the release has new functionality out of my hardware.. other than that.. I think most just like having the latest and greatest. I guess they have a lot of time on their hands and can spend most of it upgrading software and such.. I see no reason to upgrade if there is no security patches or my hardware is already supported and no new functionality.
Old 04-04-2005, 07:15 AM   #3
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,544
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 57
When I used the kernel provided with my distro I upgraded whenever they released a new package with a new version. Now since I've patched and compiled my own I only upgrade when needed. a) because it's my baby, my greatest achievment thus far so I love it and b) I'm scared I'll break everything if I try again since I probably won't get it right
Old 04-04-2005, 09:16 AM   #4
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 14.2 Solus
Posts: 2,264

Rep: Reputation: 51
Custom compiling your kernel specifically for your machine can make your kernel smaller as it only supports your hardware and not a lot of stuff you don't have.

If your kernel is working for you, leave it alone (Don't fix it if it ain't broke) unless you just want to learn how to roll your own. If you do decide to give it a go, DON'T BLINDLY REPLACE YOUR EXISTING WORKING KERNEL. Keep it as an option in your start up menu just in case the new kernel doesn't work.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kernel 2.4 in Zipslack (Waring: unable to open an initial console | Kernel Panic...) kurtamos Linux - General 2 05-10-2006 12:58 PM
Kernel-Patch Debian Logo 2.6.2 not correctly working for custom kernel 2.6.11 smp deepclutch Debian 3 06-27-2005 03:59 AM
kernel panic: try passing init= option to kernel...installation with Red Hat 9 kergen Linux - Hardware 1 09-30-2004 03:28 AM
Unable to build NVIDIA kernel module / determin kernel version Night Ink Fedora 2 05-31-2004 04:54 PM
swithcing to fedora? pirozzi Red Hat 1 01-20-2004 04:16 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration