Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
You are welcome, but it was just the luck of the draw. I'd just signed on, yours was one of the first posts I saw, and I'd heard about Fedora and Wayland on a podcast.
I can't claim to know, but Fedora has always been a development environment - somebody has to be first. When Redhat feels it is "production ready" it will move to RHEL.
Wayland has been available for several releases - I tried it a couple of releases ago, but reversed it back out. Can't remember why. There are still programs that issue specific X11 calls that don't work in wayland - redshift for example.
For GUIs, there's full support in Gnome, KDE, and Enlightenment.
For graphics cards, Wayland has been supported by open-source drivers for about five years, but the proprietary drivers are still only available for X.
If fedora is the only distro using it why is that? Is wayland production ready or is it not that great that other distros avoid it.
I must say that, when I posted my first response, I did carefully preface it with an "I think."
In any event, Wayland is still very new and you can expect that only distros that like being bleeding edge are likely to offer it until it's tested and proven over several years. Abandoning X, which is tested and proven, albeit admittedly crusty, will be seen as a huge step by many in the Linux community.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.