LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-21-2009, 09:50 AM   #1
YevgenyEfter
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 49

Rep: Reputation: 15
Which distro is lighter - Ubuntu or openSUSE with Gnome?


Hello,

I am working on a Lenovo N100 laptop, and currently I use openSUSE with

KDE 4.2.

Actually, KDE 4.2 is very weighty for my laptop... The responsiveness of

the system is low, and it's annoying to work this way.

So, first, I thought about switching to Gnome, because it's lighter.

But Ubuntu is also a distribution which uses Gnome, and is quiet light.

Maybe someone can suggest which system would be ligher - Ubuntu or

openSUSE with Gnome?



Thanks in advance!
 
Old 04-21-2009, 09:58 AM   #2
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738
Neither of those is what I would call "light"---they are both in a class I would call "complete". This means they have installed everything they think you might need, and they have also tried to configure evertything to work "out of the box".

For light, you want Arch, Slackware, Zenwalk, or any number of others, and you want to use the simpler Desktops/Window managers such as XFCE, Fluxbox, or IceWM
 
Old 04-21-2009, 10:04 AM   #3
YevgenyEfter
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 49

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I understand, but I like openSUSE for having Yast as a system configuration tool, and Ubuntu as you said is a complete

distro. Also, I like the more complete desktop environments, like KDE or Gnome.

So, if choosing between these two, which do you think would be better? (From the point of view of performance)
 
Old 04-21-2009, 10:19 AM   #4
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixellany View Post
Neither of those is what I would call "light"
That's exactly what I was gonna post So, I second that.

Which is lighter a blue whale or a sperm whale ? a sumo or a pro wrestler ?

Last edited by H_TeXMeX_H; 04-21-2009 at 10:21 AM.
 
Old 04-21-2009, 10:28 AM   #5
thorkelljarl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,796

Rep: Reputation: 213Reputation: 213Reputation: 213
It isn't openSUSE that's slow, or, if you want to try an alternative such as XFce...

If you have the openSUSE repositories installed, you can install the packages for one of the "light" desktops that are available. After installing one of them in addition to your present desktop, you will be presented with a choice of which desktop you prefer at boot.

The system may well run even more slowly, but after you have tried the new desktop for convenience and usability, you can remove KDE and/or Gnome packages, and see if things are better. KDE/Gnome may always be reinstalled again.

You might trim your installed package selection if you accepted the package choices proposed when you installed.

In addition, if you have / on its own partition, with /home on its own, you can reinstall openSUSE without formatting /home, thereby preserving your files on /home. There may be problems with your personal settings, present as hidden files, if you are installing another desktop. You might search this forum or google for details.

Of course, you do have backup copies of those files on /home and could just copy them back.

Last edited by thorkelljarl; 04-21-2009 at 10:41 AM.
 
Old 04-21-2009, 11:38 AM   #6
mark_alfred
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux 16.04, Debian 9
Posts: 1,327

Rep: Reputation: 154Reputation: 154
Perhaps lxde would be a good choice, given that it's light yet functional. On the link I've provided, there are further links with instructions for installing it on any distribution of your choice. My personal bias is Debian, which comes with an installation CD that is already preconfigured to install lxde (or xfce, another light environment if you so choose).

I've used both Ubuntu and SuSE in the past. I will say that YAST is a great tool, but Synaptic (in Ubuntu and Debian based systems) is also great. I'm not sure which, between Ubuntu or OpenSUSE (with Gnome), is lighter, though.
 
Old 04-21-2009, 11:41 AM   #7
repo
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 8,528

Rep: Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899
This is a duplicate from
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...-gnome-720661/
 
Old 04-21-2009, 12:17 PM   #8
j1alu
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Distribution: debian gnu/linux
Posts: 798

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by YevgenyEfter View Post
I understand, but I like openSUSE for having Yast as a system configuration tool, and Ubuntu as you said is a complete

distro. Also, I like the more complete desktop environments, like KDE or Gnome.

So, if choosing between these two, which do you think would be better? (From the point of view of performance)
from this point of view i`d choose gnome,else a window-manager. a month ago i was astonished how fast gnome ran in virtualbox( sure: on debian/gnu/linux :-)). i cannot find a difference in speed between gnome and xfce in vbox.

as been said:
gnome and kde are no lightweight window management per se, and suse and buntu gotta quite comfortable amount of apps and tools out of the box (sometimes called being bloated, look at xubuntu).
you should be able to get used to a window-manager within at maximum a month and got a race-car on your laptop (you might also install it in addition to your environment, so you might do all configuration/installation from yast, day-to-day work from the wm; have a look at soad: suse on active diet
http://sda.scwlab.com/soad_linux.html).

besides that- as been said-: xfce.

if you delete the background image from kde4, choose an easy colour and
set the content of windows not to be shown during they move, and deactivate all kind of bling, you might make some progress in speed too.

Last edited by j1alu; 04-21-2009 at 12:19 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lighter version of Ubuntu? SentralOrigin Linux - Distributions 5 11-18-2008 07:54 PM
LXer: Ubuntu offers Remix, a lighter Linux for mobile users LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-03-2008 10:30 PM
Flashing Gnome Login And Missing Gnome Panels, Gnome is borked! openSuse 10.2 Perps SUSE / openSUSE 1 03-17-2008 06:22 PM
Can't compile gnome-ppp on my openSUSE Gnome computer werner1975 Linux - Software 3 10-23-2007 03:07 PM
Installing "Lighter" Window Managers in Ubuntu Erik_the_Red Linux - Newbie 3 05-24-2005 04:26 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration