Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Sorry, when I said now, I meant because it worked with my last laptop, never with this laptop.
And I'm starting to think I may just go back to Vista. I'm going to try a 32 bit Fedora 9 install, then, if that doesn't work, I think I might try Knoppix or go back to Vista.
Well, running a system with 4 Gb of memory and 2.1 GHz processor, I've had no slowdown in Vista. Also, I've never had a problem with security on Windows, especially with Vista. It's never crashed.
I would love to use Linux though because I like the software choices better and the amount of customization. I think I'm going to try to install Fedora 9 32 bit version later tonight. If it doesn't work, I am going to keep trying, but I don't have a lot of free time right now to work on my computer with all the homework I have to do, so I'd like to have more trouble-free (it really is) operating system right now. And it would be stupid to use an operating system that genuinely doesn't work well on my computer, when I have one that works extremely well already.
Sort of funny side note: I just tried to open OpenOffice and it took about 7 seconds to start up, whereas it only took Powerpoint about a second to open and start up in Vista.
Almost 50 years ago, in our quaint little motorcycle repair shop, we had a saying: "If it works, it's OK." Motorcycles have changed hugely in those 50 years, but the basic principle has not.
We had another saying--motivated largely by the vagaries of repairing British bikes from the 40s and 50s: "Get a bigger hammer." Not sure if this last one is going to help you......
I tried installing OpenSuse 11.0 and couldn't get past the first piece of text (IsoLinux 3.3 something, copyright by someone)
It was the 64 bit version (maybe I need to stick with 32 bit). I checked the hash using md5sum and it matched. I burned it as a .iso image file. How is it possible that I can never seem to get past installation in almost all of these distributions? Is it that my set up is so unique that no distrubution can support even an install?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.