Quote:
Originally Posted by Rickkkk
*** PURELY AN OPINION - APOLOGIES IN ADVANCE FOR THIS ***
I've been a Windows user since the early 90's and the XP interface was one of the better ones, * in my opinion *. Any discussion on the relative merits of different desktop environments, whether Windows or linux, is purely subjective, however. It shouldn't provoke any arguments in a forum such as this, again, in my opinion.
The original poster is looking for a desktop environment that looks like Windows XP - if anyone can help him out, please do so. If not, there is no reason to criticize.
Cheers.
|
The original poster can't be helped, though, because he doesn't
want to be helped. He just wants to troll around kicking up trouble and insult Linux (never mind that many of us who use Linux also use Windows, so whatever). He gives no explanation why the god awful Luna interface must be replicated so perfectly that these small triangles on some icons are too much for him to handle. At the same time, there's a legitimate
reason no one has replicated the default Luna theme perfectly - no one cares that much because the default blue and green Luna theme of Windows XP Home was so ugly.
Sure, that's a subjective thing but it matters that so few people ever liked how it looks. If not many people like it, there's less of a chance anyone being inspired by it so much that they want to create a pixel perfect replica.
The original poster already had a desktop environment that looks like Windows XP, but it wasn't perfect enough, apparently. Why not? No explanation given. But based on his other posts, the obvious plausible explanation is simply that he wants to troll around and insult Linux. That's why he demands some pixel perfect replica of such an ugly theme.
When someone only comes here to LinuxQuestions to troll around, and clearly has no interest in Linux, we really don't have to cater to him. That's why the replies have been so sarcastic.