Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have seen these lists on the internet that say these are the only "free" Linux distributions. Does this somehow mean that other more widely used distributions are illegal or somehow not free?
I have seen these lists on the internet that say these are the only "free" Linux distributions. Does this somehow mean that other more widely used distributions are illegal or somehow not free?
"These are all GNU/Linux distributions we know of which consist entirely of free software, and whose main distribution sites distribute only free software."
Other distributions contain some proprietary software. This does not make them illegal. Distributions containing proprietary software are not free in the sense of academic freedom. Whether this distinction is important is a matter of personal opinion.
Those are the only distributions that refuse non GPL code to be used.
Most of any distro is GPL, but stuff slips in like sun java, flash player, ndiswrapper with proprietary drivers, etc. It is socially responsible not to use this garbage, but if you can't afford clean hardware, sometimes you have no choice but to suckle off the corporate teet for driver support. (Video cards, RAID controllers, what have you.)
"These are all GNU/Linux distributions we know of which consist entirely of free software, and whose main distribution sites distribute only free software."
Other distributions contain some proprietary software. This does not make them illegal. Distributions containing proprietary software are not free in the sense of academic freedom. Whether this distinction is important is a matter of personal opinion.
----------------------
Steve Stites
OK thanks so there is nothing wrong with other distributions like opensuse because that was what I was planning on installing.
There is so much wrong with OpenSuse, I don't even know where to begin :P
But it's all a matter of opinion, so go ahead. (I started out with suse too btw.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
