What version of Linux do I use (for a beginner with an old computer)?
I have a very old Sony Vaio PCG-FX705, and I wanted to install linux on it as I've heard it's much more fast, efficient and reliable. I am new to Linux, and only want to use it for watching videos, browsing the internet, editing documents, email, etc.
Here are my specs: ProcessorAMD Athlon XP 1500+ / 1.33 GHz Memory256.0 MB / 512.0 MB (max) Hard Drive30.0 GB Operating SystemMicrosoft Windows XP Home Edition Display Type15.0 in TFT active matrix Integrated Max Resolution1400 x 1050 ( SXGA+ ) Graphics ProcessorATI RAGE Mobility M1 Optical DriveCD-RW / DVD-ROM combo - Integrated I was thinking of Xubuntu? Would that be a good choice? (I'd like it to be fast) |
Xubuntu or Lubunutu may be a good choice as they both have a lightwieght Desktop Environment.
With laptops, I had the most luck with Linux Mint. It seemed that linux mint has better driver support for wireless cards and such. However, that was a lil while back using linux mint 10 and 11 versus Ubuntu 10.04. Maybe Ubuntu has better driver support with the newer versions. Maybe try linux mint 13 xfce or Linux Mint 12 LXDE |
It depends. If you only have 256MB then Lubuntu would run better, with 512MB maybe you have a better experience with Xubuntu. Keep in mind that you not only have to use lightweight environments, but also lightweight software. Running a recent version of Firefox on a computer with 256MB will not be much fun in the long run, here would be something more lightweight like Opera or Midori better.
|
Xubuntu will run....but it wont be fun. If you really want a debian based distro with Xfce, get debian. ;)
But I'd try antix on that machine. http://antix.mepis.org/index.php?title=Main_Page http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=antix |
My Choice could be Ubuntu 12.04 LTS light weighted Desktop environment.where you can get comprehensive software update from ubuntu Repository Still April 2017
|
Quote:
|
I have debian 6.0.5 running on an old Mac blue & white. Just don't install anything graphical...and all is good. It has been running 24/7 for over a decade except for the few instances where I physically moved it or upgraded and rebooted.
processor : 0 cpu : 740/750 temperature : 31-33 C (uncalibrated) clock : 350.000000MHz revision : 2.2 (pvr 0008 0202) bogomips : 49.86 timebase : 24934566 platform : PowerMac model : PowerMac1,1 machine : PowerMac1,1 motherboard : PowerMac1,1 MacRISC Power Macintosh detected as : 66 (Blue&White G3) pmac flags : 00000000 L2 cache : 1024K unified pmac-generation : NewWorld Memory : 192 MB MemTotal: 188752 kB 6GB HDD |
Welcome to the forums awesomedog!
Learning Linux for the first time is challenging. Installing Linux on crappy old hardware is challenging. Learning Linux for the first time on crappy old hardware is a double challenge. I see a lot of people join the forums, try Linux on their old craptop, and then come to the conclusion that "Linux sucks--it's slow, the video stutters, and everything takes a long time to load--I'm going back to Windows XP!" when in fact it was their computer that sucked. Do you not have a more modern machine for your Linux experiment? Linux can be "fast, efficient and reliable" but only hardware that is "fast, efficient and reliable." Assuming you have a more powerful main computer from which you are typing your message, here are easy instructions to test-drive a distribution such as Ubuntu without making any changes to your existing Windows install: http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/virtualbox Then you can recycle the Vaio, it's outlived its useful lifespan. :) |
Since you've got a laptop (i.e. stealable), I'd advise a disto that makes it easy to encrypt your data partition (/home) if you are going to have any personal information stored on it. The reasonably friendly distros that do are
Mint. Any version will run in 512MB (the LXDE version will run in 256, but it doesn't encrypt) ZorinOS Light edition. That runs in 128MB, so you'd have no problems. |
Debian is probably the best option in your case, it allows for very stripped down, minimal installations.
But don't consider running Xfce or Firefox on a system with only 256MB of RAM... If you can get hold of another 256MB module it may then be worth your while. As it is, go for lightweight *box window managers or LXDE. Quote:
|
I was running Xubuntu and XFCE Fedora on a similar spec'd Dell with no issues. I found the LXDE distros to be a little too basic for more. The XFCE had more user friendly stuff out of the box.
|
Quote:
It's not uncommon for modern browsers to use more than 100MB of RAM, Xfce alone uses more than 200MB... 256MB is quite simply not enough memory to run Xfce comfortably. |
Quote:
Maybe you use 200MB+ for Xfce, here its not using anywhere near that much. Running debian sid Xfce, updated last about 1 month ago (its offline, so I dont keep it totally up to date). No tweaks done to reduce RAM use, 120MB RAM used at idle. |
Quote:
|
Mr dog,
I have wrestled with this for sometime and the best I can come up with is Debian,Puppy or Bodhi; the later two being preferable but they both take some getting used to! Try Bodhi/linux live cd and bare in mind the desktop is your start prompt. Fred |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 PM. |