What does this message mean when I boot Mint Rafaela?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
What does this message mean when I boot Mint Rafaela?
Hello,
I run a dual boot SSD with Win 7 and Linux Mint Rafaela lately I see this message when I boot to Mint.Both are running fine in spite of the warning message.
The attached .jpg shows the message I am getting when I boot Mint / Rafaela. It started appearing a few days ago and I haven't a clue what it means or why it's appearing. The last line with the "Kludge" in it, I always see that part, all above it is new.
The drive is an SSD and according to the Intel Toolbox program that came with the drive, it's healthy with no signs of degradation at all.
Mint works fine in spite of the odd message, no matter how many times I reboot it, it's always there and always the same.
Is Mint trying to tell me that my drive is failing for some reason?
Any suggestions will be appreciated!
Thank you,
Last edited by Ifeyegnuhow; 02-09-2016 at 03:26 PM.
Reason: More information
Gparted installed but I don't see any way to 'check' the partition...
Hi Habitual,
Thanks for the speedy reply!
With Gparted installed, if I right click on /dev/sda4 where Mint is installed, I don't see a lot of options relating to checking. In fact most of them are greyed out.
I get the choice to RESIZE-MOVE | UMOUNT MANAGE MOVE | INFORMATION
I don't know what I am looking for, but I hate to botch up the OS it's been working fine all this time with no problems!
Maybe I am not looking at the right place in Gparted, I did look at the menu bar with /dev/sda4 right clicked but didn't see any thing that I thought might be useful.
You can't run a check on a partition that is mounted. You have to do it from the live Mint DVD or USB.
You should have "Check" on the right-click list, right above "Label"
Even when mounted, "Check" is there, greyed out.
If not, what version of gparted is that?
Last edited by TxLonghorn; 02-09-2016 at 05:14 PM.
This looks to be an older BIOS definition for larger disks - and the kernel is just correcting the definition.
The BIOS specified values are only used until the boot (grub/grub2/lilo/...) gets loaded, and those use the BIOS I/O functions to load the kernel and initrd. Once the kernel is loaded, the BIOS definitions become a "don't care anymore", though the device definitions are provided to the kernel, the kernel is not bound to use them - and will use what the disk formatter tells the system it has.
In spite of the odd message the OS seems to be fine
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpollard
I don't think you have to worry about it.
This looks to be an older BIOS definition for larger disks - and the kernel is just correcting the definition.
Jpollard, Are you saying don't worry about the message or the fact I can't enable the check in Gparted? I hope it's the former
Nothing has changed system-wise and it makes me wonder why I never got this message before. As I stated before, everything seems to running fine, knock on wood.
Could it be that an update to Mint caused this to appear now on every boot?
I do have an Acronis backup of the system, in fact 3 of them. But since the backups run once a week I doubt that I have one sans the message on boot up.
That said I WAS able to run Gparted from a disc I had and run a check.... it only took a second, said the "check is complete" and it was done. I booted up and lo and behold NO odd message. I wanted to run Gparted from the CD but I couldn't find it last night. Makes sense you can't check drive that you are using.
So all is well right now thank you and all the others for the help, it is most appreciated this is the first glitch I've had since installed Mint and upgrading it to Rafaela. Speaks volumes about the reliability compared to Windows. I will most definitely NOT be moving to Win 10, 7 is as far as I intend to go it will be 7 and Linux from now on!
Oh someone asked what version of Gparted.. it is 0.18.08.0-2 i486 at least that's what I wrote on the disc.
Again many thanks and best regards to all who helped!
Jpollard, Are you saying don't worry about the message or the fact I can't enable the check in Gparted? I hope it's the former
Nothing has changed system-wise and it makes me wonder why I never got this message before. As I stated before, everything seems to running fine, knock on wood.
Could it be that an update to Mint caused this to appear now on every boot?
Thanks to all
It could very well have been a kernel update that recognized that.
It has happened to others after system updates. I googled for "!! number of heads for drive 80 restored from", and it has happend a good bit over the years (2012 was the oldest on the first page).
It appears innocuous. It MIGHT go away if the partition table/partition is recreated, but I lean more toward the BIOS initiating this. I remember the old time that specifying 255 caused the BIOS to overflow the field in the controller so that larger disks could be handled.
Now that BIOS handles LBA properly, this has disappeared. One thought just occurred - If the BIOS can handle LBA, could it have gotten set/reset to using cylinder/head/sector (CHS) addressing?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.