LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-09-2016, 03:24 PM   #1
Ifeyegnuhow
Member
 
Registered: May 2014
Location: Pa.
Distribution: Win 7 64 / Linux Mint Rafaela
Posts: 91

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
What does this message mean when I boot Mint Rafaela?


Hello,

I run a dual boot SSD with Win 7 and Linux Mint Rafaela lately I see this message when I boot to Mint.Both are running fine in spite of the warning message.

The attached .jpg shows the message I am getting when I boot Mint / Rafaela. It started appearing a few days ago and I haven't a clue what it means or why it's appearing. The last line with the "Kludge" in it, I always see that part, all above it is new.
The drive is an SSD and according to the Intel Toolbox program that came with the drive, it's healthy with no signs of degradation at all.

Mint works fine in spite of the odd message, no matter how many times I reboot it, it's always there and always the same.


Is Mint trying to tell me that my drive is failing for some reason?

Any suggestions will be appreciated!

Thank you,
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Mint Boot Screen.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	220.7 KB
ID:	20770  

Last edited by Ifeyegnuhow; 02-09-2016 at 03:26 PM. Reason: More information
 
Old 02-09-2016, 03:56 PM   #2
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Try installing gparted and run check from a right-click in gparted on the partition.
 
Old 02-09-2016, 05:01 PM   #3
Ifeyegnuhow
Member
 
Registered: May 2014
Location: Pa.
Distribution: Win 7 64 / Linux Mint Rafaela
Posts: 91

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Unhappy Gparted installed but I don't see any way to 'check' the partition...

Hi Habitual,

Thanks for the speedy reply!

With Gparted installed, if I right click on /dev/sda4 where Mint is installed, I don't see a lot of options relating to checking. In fact most of them are greyed out.

I get the choice to RESIZE-MOVE | UMOUNT MANAGE MOVE | INFORMATION

I don't know what I am looking for, but I hate to botch up the OS it's been working fine all this time with no problems!

Maybe I am not looking at the right place in Gparted, I did look at the menu bar with /dev/sda4 right clicked but didn't see any thing that I thought might be useful.

Thank you very much,

"IF"
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot from 2016-02-09 17:55:03.png
Views:	13
Size:	61.5 KB
ID:	20771   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot from 2016-02-09 17:55:36.png
Views:	16
Size:	76.6 KB
ID:	20772  
 
Old 02-09-2016, 05:04 PM   #4
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I'm stuck. Sorry.
 
Old 02-09-2016, 05:09 PM   #5
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I believe the partition has to be unmounted to check it.
Booting a LiveCD and using gParted on sda4 should enable the check option on sda4

I believe this is the equivalent to an fsck on the same.
 
Old 02-09-2016, 05:13 PM   #6
TxLonghorn
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Austin Texas
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 702

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
You can't run a check on a partition that is mounted. You have to do it from the live Mint DVD or USB.
You should have "Check" on the right-click list, right above "Label"
Even when mounted, "Check" is there, greyed out.
If not, what version of gparted is that?

Last edited by TxLonghorn; 02-09-2016 at 05:14 PM.
 
Old 02-09-2016, 05:31 PM   #7
jpollard
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2012
Location: Washington DC area
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 4,912

Rep: Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513
I don't think you have to worry about it.

This looks to be an older BIOS definition for larger disks - and the kernel is just correcting the definition.

The BIOS specified values are only used until the boot (grub/grub2/lilo/...) gets loaded, and those use the BIOS I/O functions to load the kernel and initrd. Once the kernel is loaded, the BIOS definitions become a "don't care anymore", though the device definitions are provided to the kernel, the kernel is not bound to use them - and will use what the disk formatter tells the system it has.
 
Old 02-10-2016, 09:43 AM   #8
Ifeyegnuhow
Member
 
Registered: May 2014
Location: Pa.
Distribution: Win 7 64 / Linux Mint Rafaela
Posts: 91

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
In spite of the odd message the OS seems to be fine

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpollard View Post
I don't think you have to worry about it.

This looks to be an older BIOS definition for larger disks - and the kernel is just correcting the definition.
Jpollard, Are you saying don't worry about the message or the fact I can't enable the check in Gparted? I hope it's the former

Nothing has changed system-wise and it makes me wonder why I never got this message before. As I stated before, everything seems to running fine, knock on wood.

Could it be that an update to Mint caused this to appear now on every boot?

Thanks to all
 
Old 02-10-2016, 09:52 AM   #9
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I believe you should have a backup strategy that includes tested backups.
I'd ignore the message under those conditions.

It could be an "SSD thing", but I don't know.
 
Old 02-10-2016, 10:07 AM   #10
Ifeyegnuhow
Member
 
Registered: May 2014
Location: Pa.
Distribution: Win 7 64 / Linux Mint Rafaela
Posts: 91

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Habitual,

I do have an Acronis backup of the system, in fact 3 of them. But since the backups run once a week I doubt that I have one sans the message on boot up.

That said I WAS able to run Gparted from a disc I had and run a check.... it only took a second, said the "check is complete" and it was done. I booted up and lo and behold NO odd message. I wanted to run Gparted from the CD but I couldn't find it last night. Makes sense you can't check drive that you are using.

So all is well right now thank you and all the others for the help, it is most appreciated this is the first glitch I've had since installed Mint and upgrading it to Rafaela. Speaks volumes about the reliability compared to Windows. I will most definitely NOT be moving to Win 10, 7 is as far as I intend to go it will be 7 and Linux from now on!

Oh someone asked what version of Gparted.. it is 0.18.08.0-2 i486 at least that's what I wrote on the disc.

Again many thanks and best regards to all who helped!

"IF"
 
Old 02-10-2016, 10:13 AM   #11
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well, my backups are for data
The OS, not so much. I can re-install in 15 minutes.
Separate /home is a life-saver.

Glad it worked out!
 
Old 02-10-2016, 12:41 PM   #12
jpollard
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2012
Location: Washington DC area
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 4,912

Rep: Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ifeyegnuhow View Post
Jpollard, Are you saying don't worry about the message or the fact I can't enable the check in Gparted? I hope it's the former

Nothing has changed system-wise and it makes me wonder why I never got this message before. As I stated before, everything seems to running fine, knock on wood.

Could it be that an update to Mint caused this to appear now on every boot?

Thanks to all
It could very well have been a kernel update that recognized that.
 
Old 02-13-2016, 11:55 AM   #13
Ifeyegnuhow
Member
 
Registered: May 2014
Location: Pa.
Distribution: Win 7 64 / Linux Mint Rafaela
Posts: 91

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Message on boot up has returned!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpollard View Post
It could very well have been a kernel update that recognized that.
Hi jollard,

Well it might have been, but I am sorry to report the message is back again! Grrr!

System runs normally I hate to ignore messages but maybe in this case I have to?

Thought it was sorted when I ran Gparted and the "check' that did cure it on a few reboots but now it's back and I'm scratching my head!

thank you for any input you or anyone else may have,

"IF"
 
Old 02-13-2016, 12:29 PM   #14
jpollard
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2012
Location: Washington DC area
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 4,912

Rep: Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513Reputation: 1513
It has happened to others after system updates. I googled for "!! number of heads for drive 80 restored from", and it has happend a good bit over the years (2012 was the oldest on the first page).

It appears innocuous. It MIGHT go away if the partition table/partition is recreated, but I lean more toward the BIOS initiating this. I remember the old time that specifying 255 caused the BIOS to overflow the field in the controller so that larger disks could be handled.

Now that BIOS handles LBA properly, this has disappeared. One thought just occurred - If the BIOS can handle LBA, could it have gotten set/reset to using cylinder/head/sector (CHS) addressing?

Last edited by jpollard; 02-13-2016 at 12:32 PM.
 
Old 02-13-2016, 03:03 PM   #15
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
How was this "update" done exactly?

Regular
Code:
sudo apt-get upgrade
only will update Level[123] - same as Update Manager. Kernels are not in this 'set'.
and
Code:
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
is Levels[1-5], kernels are in this this 'set'.

Off-hand, I'd boot another LiveCD and run check, or just ignore the message.
Have you considered upgrading to 17.3?
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Antivirus forlinux mint cinnamon rafaela 17.2 lilly1 Linux - Newbie 8 09-28-2015 01:33 PM
LXer: Linux Mint 17.2 “Rafaela” Xfce released! LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-07-2015 12:03 PM
LXer: Linux Mint 17.2 “Rafaela” Xfce RC released! LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-17-2015 08:20 AM
LXer: Linux Mint 17.2 Rafaela available for download LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-16-2015 05:16 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration