Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I experience very poor system performance when running programs that need a lot of memory.
Open Office start up e.g. takes 2 minutes, and opening a small document in it takes cca. 30 seconds...
I have only a P233 machine with 64 Megs of memory, but the same programs show much better performance in windows.
I suspect that the poor performance in Linux may be due to the extensive, unreasonable use of the disk cache memory.
So far as I can judge, Linux uses the disk cache even when there is plenty of free physical memory to use.
An example: I see that the system uses 28M disk cache, when there is 38 M free (cached) physical memory.
Is there a way I can change the memory-handling policy of Linux to use the disk cache only when there is no free physical memory?
KDE is one of the most memory intensive window managers/desktop environments. You might want to try running something less greedy - I hear that BlackBox is good.
Distribution: DEBIAN! - (also used: Red Hat, Mandrake, Slackware, SuSE, BestLinux, EasyLinux, muLinux...)
Posts: 92
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by J_Szucs I like KDE and I would prefer to keep it.
First I would like to know if the memory management policy can be optimized in Linux.
Everything can be optimized, you can start by optimizing the way you use your linux box . clean up services, recompile kernel, but also get more RAM, *get rid of KDE...*. Well if you absolutely want KDE try not to load to many stupid unnecessary things like fading menus and other useless s***t (4 example screensavers)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.