LinuxQuestions.org - Using 'time' command with multiple background processes

- Linux - Newbie (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/)

- - Using 'time' command with multiple background processes (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/using-time-command-with-multiple-background-processes-668506/)

Using 'time' command with multiple background processes

To test various compiler optimizations, I'm running a shell script which runs several processes in the background simultaneously:

Code:

./readfile output1.clock.bin filter1.bin &

./readfile output2.clock.bin filter2.bin &

./readfile output3.clock.bin filter3.bin &

./readfile output4.clock.bin filter4.bin &

When I try to use the bash 'time' builtin or the GNU 'time' command, it seems as though the command will only time the execution of the script itself, which is not helpful (that takes about 0.00s!).

I've tried various combinations of parentheses, &'s, &&'s, etc. but I can't seem to find the right syntax...

I would like to be able to run N processes, in the background, simultaneously, in order to test the processing capabilities of my CPU.

Thanks in advance!

-Jordan

Can you not just take the contents of your script and use them as actual command?

Add the cmd 'time' to the start of each cmd line and save the output to a numbered file

@chrism01,

Do you mean to make a separate output file for each command, and then to add up the times by hand? Take the average of the times?

I would like to know how long it takes to run all 4 commands, simultaneously. Call it a simple experiment in parallel processing.

I was looking for something like this:

Code:

time ( command1 & ; command2 & ; command3 & )

but this doesn't execute the commands simultaneously. A pipe does, so I read, but these commands are not related, so can't be sensibly piped.

Use wait:

Code:

$ cat sleep.sh 

#!/bin/bash



sleep 2 &

sleep 10 &

sleep 5 &

wait



$ time ./sleep.sh



real    0m10.017s

user    0m0.734s

sys    0m0.729s

@Mr. C: That's exactly what I needed. Thanks.