Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've been trying to install a more recent version of Mozilla - though with little success. Ideally I'd like to do this without necessarily using RPMs - for learning purposes. Unfortunately I seem to be encountering problems and I'm getting an error message to the effect that the following file is missing:
libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
I've tried 'locate libstdc' and - if I understand the information correctly - it seems that I have a higher version of the file installed, namely:
libstdc++-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so
I've seen a post elsewhere on the forum suggesting that it is possible to create a symbolic link from the new file to the old file to enable the software to be installed. Could anybody expand on how this would be done as I confess this leaves me dumbfounded.
Nah, it just made Mozilla happy enough to install. If its the wrong lib, if Mozilla ever makes a call to that lib its going to bug, but then again... it might never call that lib if you don't use say... arcane utility X. Most likely you'll be fine.
It's newer version. I use such tricks myself all the time and it's always OK. Of course, when I have a newer version.
There can be programs that need one specific version, but I don't think Mozilla is the case.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.