Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
01-28-2005, 12:44 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 11
Rep:
|
upgrade glibc problem
Hi,
I am quite inexperienced in linux. So actually I did not knew what glibc is.
I had glibc 2.2 on my computer, which has red hat linux. I tried to install glibc 2.3 rpm, but it gave some conflict errors.
Then I typed
rpm -i --force glibc2.3.X.rpm
and installed it. I did not remove the previous version of glibc.
Will this cause a problem. AT the moment it nothing seems to be wrong. But as I have read in some forums, it will cause me problems.
So how can I correct this.
Is there a way to keep glibc2.3 without getting problems. Or is there a way that I can go back to glibc 2.2 without cauisng problems.
Please help.
Thanks a lot,
Chamal.
|
|
|
01-28-2005, 03:30 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696
|
Installing with --force option is always risky. The way to get back to glibc 2.2 is to get the right RPM (the version you had previously) and install it (with --force).
Glibc is used by many programs, so when it breakes there may be problems. The best way to update glibc is to update glibc with all programs using it. I don't know which version of RedHat you use...Do you have a tool for automatic upgrades with dependencies? Or if, you don't know, which version or RedHat do you use?
|
|
|
01-29-2005, 12:26 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 11
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi Mara,
Thanks for the reply.
I am not sure which version of red hat linux I am using. How can check the version.
Also Is there a way to find out the exact version number of previous glibc. Will it be in a log file.
Do I have to remove glibc2.3 before installing the previous version or do I have to overwrite it. which way is better.
THanks a lot,
Chamal.
|
|
|
01-29-2005, 05:31 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Slackware, ROCK
Posts: 1,973
Rep:
|
generally, unless your chrooted into an environment, you always overwrite. if you remove glibc, your system is hosed (even commands like ls, cd, rpm, virtually everything uses the standard c library in one way or another).
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|