Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Since the other thread is on LQ, it's not really useful starting a new thread top point to that one ...
Next time you don't want to forget the location of something, either add it to your subscribed threads (click Thread Tools>Subscribe to this Thread) or simply bookmark it in your browser or even in your user profile
Please know that I am very sensitive to the need to avoid redundancy.
I did it this way for two reasons:
1. There are a lot of posts that come up where this tutorial is useful
2. I could not find the link when I was replying to someone's question
Here's a suggestion for LQ: Is there somewhere and index of favorite tutorials? Not FAQs, but links to thing like this one that will be universally useful.
Another thing that periodically comes to mind: When someone starts a thread, hwy not prompt them to enter where they have looked. Don't require a response to allow them to post---but just have this gentle reminder. It could be simply a couple of check boxes---eg yes, I checked Google, yes I did an LQ search---etc.
Posting references to others posts makes no sense.
Tink
What???? All the time, I see people posting links--including links to stuff in LQ. I have seen it as helpful.
Granted, we wish people were doing their own searching---but they don't always do that--especially those just off the turnip truck.
Posting a link is somehow more satisfying than simply telling someone: "It's there--YOU find it." In this case, I SEARCHED LQ to find to original dd post--no luck. Only when I searched on the author did I find it.
Tinksters post may be a bit curt, but in essence I have to agree: the thread you link to has a very clear title and your post is simply an empty shell... I understand why you did it, but there are other means as I pointed out before.
If the link had been from outside the forum it might make a little more sense, but even so it would be better placed under the LQ bookmarks "Linux Links"
If someone had asked the question and your post had
been a response, sure, point him there.
But to keep a thread you find interesting high in
numbers or easy for you to find by posting a reference
to it for that very purpose makes no sense in terms of
the board. You might want to put it in your social bookmarks.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.