LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-11-2020, 03:50 PM   #1
sam_o_rogers
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 51
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 15
Unhappy Trouble with incompatible environment.


I am listing this under newbie, though I have a number of Linux systems.

Was given a Toshiba Satellite computer that originally had Window Vista on it. However the disk drive had been removed. Had an empty ATA SanDisk Ultra II 240 gig drive that was brand new. Have Ubuntu 10.04 on a memory stick. (Kernel Linux 2.6.32-28-generic GNOME 2.30.2) So I pop in the hard drive, plug in the memory stick and boot up the machine. It came up with the Ubuntu install option, which I proceeded with, no problem.

Well, 10.04 is a little out of date. I go to the update manager and get the message "Your Ubuntu release is not supported anymore
You will not get any further security fixes or critical updates. Please Upgrade to a later version version of Ubuntu Linux.

No problem, just go to Ubuntu.com and get a new download. The version of Firefox provided on the 10.04 release of Ubuntu is 3.6.13. At www.ubuntu.com, I get an error:
Secure Connection Failed
An error occured during a connection to www.ubuntu.com
cannot communicate securely with peer: no common encryption algorithm(s).

(Error code: ssl_error_no_cypher_overlap)

This was the first compatibility problem.

I try downloading a new firefox from Mozilla, unpack it into a new folder and try to run firefox from a terminal, and get an error cannot execute binary file.

So next I go to another computer, and pull down ubuntu-18.04.4-desktop-amd64.iso onto another usb drive. That computer is running Linux Mint, and I don't know where startup disk creater is on that machine.

Go to the 10.04 machine and use startup disk creator on that one.

Point to the .iso file. Point to a new usb drive, and run the creator. It chugs along for a while and finally tells me I can use the new disk to boot Linux.

Well, not quite. I get the followin:

Syslinux 3.53 Debian-2008-07-15 EBIOS Copyright (C) 1994-2008 Peter Avin
Missing Parameter in configuration file.
LOADING... boot:

Then it goes to the next line and hangs therer with a flashing cursor.

This is the second compatibility problem.

I tried using UnetBootin, but that had errors.

I don't care about the hard drive, I have no problem reformatting it and starting over. I'm just a little puzzled why I had no problem getting the 10.04 usb drive to boot. Looking at the Kernel version, it looks like it is a 32 bit version. When I downloaded the Unetbootin I grabbed both the 64 bit and the 32 bit versions, and it wouldn't run the 64 bit version, but would the 32 bit version, though there were errors thrown. It did run to completion, but it gets stuck in an automatic boot countdown loop. I am assuming that Mozilla automatically assumed I wanted a 64 bit version. Neither firefox nor firefox-bin will run from the command line.

Just sign me Frustrated.
Missing parameter
 
Old 04-11-2020, 05:00 PM   #2
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,882
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930
I'd try kubuntu or lubuntu

Last edited by rtmistler; 04-11-2020 at 05:01 PM.
 
Old 04-12-2020, 01:04 AM   #3
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,110
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474
Quote:
though I have a number of Linux systems.
Hope you are (md5sum or sha) check sums of down loaded iso files. It saves headaches later on.

https://www.howtogeek.com/67241/htg-...-i-check-them/
 
Old 04-12-2020, 02:43 PM   #4
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
Long story short: 10.04 is too old, you cannot securely connect to the 'net anymore.
Obtain a suitable distro (surely not the newest Ubuntu, but something for old computers), burn it on a USB with dd, satisfaction!
 
Old 04-12-2020, 04:03 PM   #5
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,882
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930
On your mint machine why not use the dd command to write the iso to USB?
Code:
$ dd if=<iso-file> of=/dev/<usb drive letter> bs=32M
 
Old 04-13-2020, 10:15 PM   #6
sam_o_rogers
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 51

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 15
First, yes, I did run the checksum, and the checksum said it was OK.

Next, I changed directory to the directory that contained the .iso file and executed the following: (Yes, I did set user to root)

#dd if=ubuntu-18.04.4-desktop-amd64.iso of=/dev/sdb1 bs=32M
63+1 records in
63+1 records out
2126544896 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 457.603 s, 4.6 MB/s
#

This disk now shows up on the Mint machine as Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS amd64

Next I took the newly copied memory stick and tried booting with it in the Toshiba Satellite and got this:

ISOLINUX 6.03 20171017 EHDD Copyright (C) 1994-2014 H. Peter Avin et al
No DEFAULT or UI configuration directive found!
boot:

On the Mint machine, I can see the folders and files on the Ubuntu drive. But I haven't a clue what is needed to supply the correct DEFAULT or UI configuration directive.

I am beginning to think that listing this on the newbie forum was the correct decision, since I seem to be taking such small baby steps.
 
Old 04-13-2020, 11:54 PM   #7
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,110
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474
Mint has some safe and recovery boot options that might help on the toshiba.

Here are some cheat codes.

https://wiki.unraid.net/index.php/Boot_Codes
 
Old 04-14-2020, 04:25 AM   #8
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
Quote:
Originally Posted by sam_o_rogers View Post
of=/dev/sdb1
wrong.
It needs to be /dev/sdb - without the partition number.
That is, if you're 200% sure that sdb really is the USB stick you want to burn that Ubuntu on.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-14-2020, 01:36 PM   #9
sam_o_rogers
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 51

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 15
Thumbs up

Success!

Credit the resolution of this problem to rokytnji for pointing out that it is important to run the SHA checksum on the .iso file.
Credit rtmistler for providing the dd command that was specifically needed to create the bootable memory stick.
Credit ondoho for pointing out that I needed to use the base drive, and not a partition on the drive as the output file.

The memory stick booted, and Ubuntu 18 is currently being installed on the Toshiba Satellite. I took the defaults, and selected the full generic Ubuntu.

I still do not know what needs to be done to fix the original Firefox so it can access Ubuntu, but I will worry about that another time, since I will be getting a current version of the browser with Ubuntu 18.
 
Old 04-15-2020, 01:19 AM   #10
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
Congratulations!
Quote:
Originally Posted by sam_o_rogers View Post
I still do not know what needs to be done to fix the original Firefox so it can access Ubuntu, but I will worry about that another time, since I will be getting a current version of the browser with Ubuntu 18.
And that's probably all it needs as I pointed out in post #4.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
yahoo incompatible? Brain Drop General 3 09-02-2003 08:05 AM
trouble ahead, trouble behind....trouble with mplayer Goonie Linux - Software 3 07-02-2003 02:29 AM
Compiling Evolution 1.4 issues on Slackware 9 (incompatible db3 version) Obi-Wan_Kenobi Slackware 2 06-11-2003 11:54 AM
Getting an incompatible pointer type error... JStew Programming 4 03-06-2003 05:08 PM
Installing Wine - incompatible pointer type orange400 Linux - Software 1 03-03-2003 12:57 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration