Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
03-21-2017, 08:19 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2017
Posts: 2
Rep: 
|
top command shows negative values
Hello
This is my first question to forum!!
we have encountered a problem with top command running on Linux.
please find the below output :
top - 04:37:54 up 10 days, 12:49, 1 user, load average: 0.20, 0.17, 0.10
Tasks: 690 total, 1 running, 689 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu0 :-361980760699577565184.0%us,-361980760699577565184.0%sy,-1956022565642342
Cpu1 :-129.5%us,-67.6%sy,-67.6%ni, 0.0%id,-69.9%wa,-40.5%hi,-40.5%si,-59.8%st
Cpu2 :-448171072580659183616.0%us,-397927367025342021632.0%sy,-2598415664646748
Cpu3 :-40.1%us,-40.1%sy,-25.6%ni, 0.0%id,-80.1%wa,-40.1%hi,-40.1%si,-42.5%st
Cpu4 :-37.6%us,-78.7%sy,-37.9%ni, 0.0%id,-91.7%wa,-37.6%hi,-128.1%si,-88.3%st
Can someone tell me under which condition the top command would return negative values ?
Is there a known bug w.r.t top command ? if yes do we have patches ?
thanks.
|
|
|
03-21-2017, 09:07 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Horgau, Germany
Distribution: Manjaro KDE, Win 10
Posts: 2,199
Rep: 
|
Which distro are you using?
top should show positive values.
|
|
|
03-21-2017, 09:11 AM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,940
|
Looks possibly like a sign extend or variable size problem. Such as 64-bit program run on a 32-bit machine.
What distribution and what version of it are you using?
What are your machine specs?
What is the version of top?
|
|
|
03-21-2017, 11:01 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2011
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,950
|
You appear to have a 5-CPU machine.
|
|
|
03-22-2017, 04:31 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2017
Posts: 2
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Top command shows negative values
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtmistler
Looks possibly like a sign extend or variable size problem. Such as 64-bit program run on a 32-bit machine.
What distribution and what version of it are you using?
2.6.32
What are your machine specs?
What is the version of top?
|
procps version 3.2.7
any known bug is their top utility ?
|
|
|
03-22-2017, 06:21 AM
|
#6
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,940
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mylinuxworld
kernel 2.6.32
procps version 3.2.7
any known bug is their top utility ?
|
Not really full answers here. The distribution and machine specs might have been helpful. Machine specs especially given my concerns about 64-bit and 32-bit discrepancies as well as JeremyBoden's observation:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyBoden
You appear to have a 5-CPU machine.
|
So,
2.6.32 kernel dates back to 2009, however that is the correct procps version to go with that kernel. And that version went EOL last year https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/12/78.
Either case, I believe 2.6 kernels came in two release forms, 64-bit or 32-bit. 64-bit on a 32-bit machine may be fine. And I'm thinking that 32-bit on a 64-bit machine may be fine, but there may be oddities which you're seeing here.
I do not see any top() bugs cited.
Once again, machine specs may help here. To really debug this better, someone would likely have to take the time to compile procps 3.2.7 from source, with the debug flag, and debug top() when you run it.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|