Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have a PII 400mhz with 64mb of ram. I just installed Redhat 9 and I tried using both KDE and GNOME but they are both too slow. I was woundering if installed XFCE would that fix my problem.
Originally posted by valdivrk I have a PII 400mhz with 64mb of ram. I just installed Redhat 9 and I tried using both KDE and GNOME but they are both too slow. I was woundering if installed XFCE would that fix my problem.
most likely yes. also, any light window manager would be even faster. is it just regular slow or i-can't-do-anything-whatsoever slow?
Its not so slow that its unusable, it takes a while for things to load. If you move a window over icons on the desktop they disappear for a second then come back. The one thing thats so slow to start up that you have to click on it and go do something else for awhile is the add/remove packages. I really hate that thing compared to gnorpm or kpackage. I would change distros but I already bought Redhat 9 and I'm still pretty new to this whole linux thing so I needed something newbie friendly. I just want to keep Redhat 9 for awhile but I want it to be faster than Gnome (thats what I'm using now).
Originally posted by valdivrk Its not so slow that its unusable, it takes a while for things to load. If you move a window over icons on the desktop they disappear for a second then come back. The one thing thats so slow to start up that you have to click on it and go do something else for awhile is the add/remove packages. I really hate that thing compared to gnorpm or kpackage. I would change distros but I already bought Redhat 9 and I'm still pretty new to this whole linux thing so I needed something newbie friendly. I just want to keep Redhat 9 for awhile but I want it to be faster than Gnome (thats what I'm using now).
if it's not virtually unusable, that rules out problems like enabling dma and such.
so yes, change guis. if you're comfortable with it, i would highly recommend not using a desktop environment. even on my fast machines i use a window manager instead of a desktop environment because i like it better.
now this is where the thread turns into "this is the best wm"....
...but i would highly recommend fluxbox, blackbox, enlightenment, or icewm. take a look for yourself though.
Sorry for this questions as it has probably been answered many times but can you please give me a brief description of the differences between a window manager and a desktop enviornment
Originally posted by valdivrk Sorry for this questions as it has probably been answered many times but can you please give me a brief description of the differences between a window manager and a desktop enviornment
This is just a suggestion and I respect your choice of distro. I just want to share this with you because my first experience with Linux using RH9 is the same with you even this PII 450MHz of mine is already installed with 128MB of RAM.
The outstanding reviews and impressions I've read in LQ and a very encouraging one in www.osnews.com (but the link is now inactive but if you want, I can email to you the entire review), has really made me tried this distro. And the result, they are right and I agreed with them - Slackware is really fast.
Besides, this distro's administration style is very simple. This is so far the only Linux distro I'm using now together with OpenBSD for my network security needs.
Originally posted by gani Why not add another 64MB to your system and try Slackware 10 that can be downloaded at http://iso.linuxquestions.org.
yeah, i have a pII 400 that can easily run with kde. i think the difference is that it has a lot of ram. if you can afford it, you might want to look into buying more ram for your computer.
I'll probably just buy more ram, use Redhat for a few more weeks then since i keep hearing good things about Slackware ill end up buying some cheap iso's online (stuck with 56k for right now). I would like to thank everyone for helping me out with this little problem and for the quick replys.
I have 512 Meg of RAM, using KDE with mandrake 8.1 and i always keep running out of room - my hd does not allow DMA - tried to enable it - any other suggestions?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.