LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-05-2010, 08:10 PM   #1
trist007
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052

Rep: Reputation: 70
Thinking about switching to AT&T DSL and have a question about DSL modem...


I currently have Time Warner Road Runner and on avg I get about 3.0 Mb/s down and 250 Kb/s up. I was told that the DSL central office is within 6000 ft of my residence. They boast that I could get up to 6.0 Mb/s down and 765 Kb/s up. I'm just hoping for about 4.0 - 5.0 Mb/s and at least 500 Kb/s up.

However, my dad has DSL. We had a linksys router attached it to it. I remember having problems where the DSL modem's firmware would conflict with the linksys router's firmware. Is there a way to deactivate the firmware on the DSL modem so that the router's firmware could do all the port forwarding and other administrative tasks? Or does it depend on which type of DSL Modem I get?

Should I go for it?
 
Old 01-05-2010, 08:28 PM   #2
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid/RPIOS
Posts: 4,905
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537
the 2wire modem from att is a also a router, the one I have is a wireless/wired router/modem with 4 wired ports, supports up up to 10 pcs. No need for a second router.
 
Old 01-05-2010, 08:29 PM   #3
trist007
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 70
Thing is, I got open ddwrt on my router. I would prefer that over the 2wire firmware.
 
Old 01-05-2010, 08:49 PM   #4
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
Just an aside from someone that's done a lot of HSD installs, CHECK WITH YOUR NEIGHBORS that are using AT&T to see what they are actually getting if you plan on signing any contracts. Generally cable will be faster than DSL although that is a VERY GENERAL statement. Unfortunately TWC isn't the best company to deal with in my experience, but that's off the subject. Best of luck.
 
Old 01-05-2010, 09:44 PM   #5
lleb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Distribution: CentOS/Fedora/Pop!_OS
Posts: 2,983

Rep: Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by trist007 View Post
I currently have Time Warner Road Runner and on avg I get about 3.0 Mb/s down and 250 Kb/s up. I was told that the DSL central office is within 6000 ft of my residence. They boast that I could get up to 6.0 Mb/s down and 765 Kb/s up. I'm just hoping for about 4.0 - 5.0 Mb/s and at least 500 Kb/s up.

However, my dad has DSL. We had a linksys router attached it to it. I remember having problems where the DSL modem's firmware would conflict with the linksys router's firmware. Is there a way to deactivate the firmware on the DSL modem so that the router's firmware could do all the port forwarding and other administrative tasks? Or does it depend on which type of DSL Modem I get?

Should I go for it?
that has everything to do with the DSL provider installing a ROUTER and not a MODEM. a modem is just like the old 56k dial up days. it connects, it authenticates, it passes traffic. what more and more Telcos and ISPs are installing are ROUTERS to monitor remote and control the EU network. this is bunk IMHO. if they sell you a contract with a MODEM, then damn it install a bloody modem with nothing more then what a MODEM does.

if you replace the DSL router with a MODEM the problem at your dads will be solved 99.9% of the time.

one of the easiest ways to check if you have a router instead of a modem is to look at your workstations IP. is it a private IP (192.168.x.x or 10.0.x.x or something like that) then it is a ROUTER and not a modem. ask to have it replaced with a pure modem no routing, you will install your own router if you wish those capabilities. then put up a cheap SoHo router or build an IPCop firewall/router.
 
Old 01-05-2010, 09:55 PM   #6
trist007
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 70
What's the EU network, why do they want to monitor and control it? How much does a dsl modem run? So if they give me a router and i replace it with a modem it should work fine? Doesn't the router have a unique MAC that is necessary? or do you just need an email/password to authenticate?
 
Old 01-06-2010, 12:20 AM   #7
lleb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Distribution: CentOS/Fedora/Pop!_OS
Posts: 2,983

Rep: Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by trist007 View Post
What's the EU network, why do they want to monitor and control it? How much does a dsl modem run? So if they give me a router and i replace it with a modem it should work fine? Doesn't the router have a unique MAC that is necessary? or do you just need an email/password to authenticate?
EU = end user, that would be you.

why do they want to monitor, simple so they can bill you more for it. i just helped a friend with this exact situation (the one you dad is facing) with Bellsouth.net selling a router as a modem, now her wifi router does not work. real simple to diagnose too. when she plugs directly into the "modem" she pulls a private 192.168.x.x IP address. that is IMPOSSIBLE unless her modem is really a router.

no, just replacing the router with a modem will not work. first off you need to know if the telco/ISP is running PPPoE or PPPoA, then after you know that and purchase the correct modem/router you will have to call your telco/isp and register the MAC address of YOUR modem/router with them before it will function properly. that is if they are even willing to support 3rd party hardware and many telcos/isps will not.

you need all 3. the MAC/user name/pass word in order to connect and the user/pw are only needed for PPPoE not PPPoA as that only requires the MAC address of the hardware.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
switching between slackware 12 & ubuntu hardy stops internet connection (dsl) spamhippy Linux - Networking 9 06-01-2008 04:42 AM
switching from DSL to Cable Modem Network Problems ivycomputer Linux - Networking 3 04-11-2007 03:30 PM
D-Link DSL-200 Rev B DSL modem -- success!! ludeKing Linux - Hardware 1 03-11-2007 07:32 PM
Suse 9.1 with Router & DSL Modem Shinoby Linux - Networking 1 11-02-2004 10:09 AM
Dsl Modem Installation -- Aztech Dsl Turbo 100 psganesh Linux - Networking 0 07-01-2004 03:04 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration