Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
You have to install the kernel source. In redhat, there should be a kernel source rpm. I haven't used redhat for quite a while, but on mandrake you could use the "urpmi" command to install rpm's. The package is on your installation disks somewhere.
yup. man this is retarded. I looked through several books and sites on RH9 and it's supposed to be there. So pretty ticked at it at this point. Since i gotta install the source, can i go out and install 2.6 kernel instead of 2.4? I found an rpm for it, but will i have the same problem with that directory not being found?
Are you sure redhat's not installing the source somewhere else? Try searching for "linux" or "linux-2.4.*" either in a file manager or with "locate" on the command line.
I wouldn't monkey around with the 2.6 source unless you want to try compiling and running it. If you aren't actually running the 2.6 kernel, the source is no good.
Thats a good idea. I shoulda thought of that. Oh well, I got home from work lastnight and my system has removable HDD racks so that i can swith HDs whenever i want. Anyways, i put in my RH9 drive and i got the ever-famous no OS found error. I did'nt make a boot disk. ><
SO, in process of installing SuSE 9. I bought the distro of amazon and it comes with all the user and admin guides i need, so i figured i'll give it a shot and see if i have better luck. SuSE can install RPMs, so that makes it about the same operation that i was attempting on RH9. Thanks for the advice though
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.