Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
03-18-2017, 12:18 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2016
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Jessie
Posts: 154
Rep:
|
Tails OS won't download from their website
I'm using Debian Jessie and wanted to install Tails OS onto a usb stick.
The tails website showed me how to download 'tails-installer' on debian which needs to be run to install the Tails OS.
However, when I try to download the tails .iso from their site, the download keeps failing.
The name of the .iso is:
Code:
tails-i386-2.11.iso
This seems to mean the .iso is for an Intel 32-bit. I've found from reddit that the .iso will also work for an Intel 64-bit.
My problem is I have an amd64 bit processor.
So does this mean Tails only works for people who have Intel processors?
Also, why is the .iso verified by downloading a firefox add-on or downloading OpenPGP? It would be easier for linux users to do a simple checksum operation using the terminal. Why is it necessary to download a third-party app?
|
|
|
03-18-2017, 01:03 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,184
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpforprez
Also, why is the .iso verified by downloading a firefox add-on or downloading OpenPGP? It would be easier for linux users to do a simple checksum operation using the terminal. Why is it necessary to download a third-party app?
|
The checksum just tells you that the downloaded ISO was (hopefully) not corrupted during the transfer. But it is still possible that it be not a genuine Tail ISO but one provided by one of your enemies, or some public or private spy.
I can only answer this part of your post as I do not run Debian but Slint.
|
|
|
03-18-2017, 01:47 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 26,213
|
AMD64 and x86-64 are used interchangeably for the 64 bit PC architecture and it does not matter which actual CPU is installed in your computer. The 64 bit version of tails is scheduled to be released June 2017 so the 32 bit version is all there is at the moment. And as you have discovered 32 bit versions will run on a 64 bit processor.
I can only guess that in the eyes of the authors the two download techniques provide suitable security measures to automatically download the ISO file.
How does the download fail? Have you tried the download using the other distribution method versus using the firefox plugin.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
03-18-2017, 01:52 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
|
you can use bittorrent.
https://tails.boum.org/torrents/file...6-2.11.torrent
is the link to use, once you installed transmission or some other torrent client.
advantages: torrents are checksum-checked automatically.
and since they have only one version to download, it will most likely be suitable for your machine.
please be aware that tails is not meant to be installed, but always run from the live usb.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
03-18-2017, 02:13 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Distribution: Linux Mint
Posts: 194
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpforprez
I'm using Debian Jessie and wanted to install Tails OS onto a usb stick.
The tails website showed me how to download 'tails-installer' on debian which needs to be run to install the Tails OS.
However, when I try to download the tails .iso from their site, the download keeps failing.
The name of the .iso is:
Code:
tails-i386-2.11.iso
This seems to mean the .iso is for an Intel 32-bit. I've found from reddit that the .iso will also work for an Intel 64-bit.
|
Try one of the other methods if it fails to download via the add-on. Looks like they have BitTorrent and downloading directly (the manual OpenPGP verification link.) I would be surprised if the BitTorrent option didn't at least work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpforprez
My problem is I have an amd64 bit processor.
So does this mean Tails only works for people who have Intel processors?
|
No, either way it's x86. Likewise "amd64" packages will work on 64-bit Intel processors. It's all the same architecture.
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpforprez
Also, why is the .iso verified by downloading a firefox add-on or downloading OpenPGP? It would be easier for linux users to do a simple checksum operation using the terminal. Why is it necessary to download a third-party app?
|
Checksum only verifies that the file was downloaded without errors. The verification is about verifying the identity of who's providing you the download via public-key encryption, since hypothetically another site could offer you their own false MD5 checksum. (Of course at that point, one might be left to wonder how trustworthy this site is itself, but... *shrug*)
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
03-18-2017, 03:42 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2016
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Jessie
Posts: 154
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didier Spaier
The checksum just tells you that the downloaded ISO was (hopefully) not corrupted during the transfer. But it is still possible that it be not a genuine Tail ISO but one provided by one of your enemies, or some public or private spy.
I can only answer this part of your post as I do not run Debian but Slint.
|
Well, this is very interesting.
What about a sha256sum? I use that to verify the download of a Debian OS.
Is a sha256sum also vulnerable?
|
|
|
03-18-2017, 03:52 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,184
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpforprez
Well, this is very interesting.
What about a sha256sum? I use that to verify the download of a Debian OS.
Is a sha256sum also vulnerable?
|
The only difference is that the probability of a matching checksum although the local (downloaded) file be not identical to the remote one is then smaller. But it still doesn't tell you who actually uploaded the file to the remote server, in other words whether this is a genuine Tail ISO or not.
For instance see this blog post.
Last edited by Didier Spaier; 03-18-2017 at 03:56 PM.
|
|
|
03-18-2017, 03:57 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2016
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Jessie
Posts: 154
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelk
AMD64 and x86-64 are used interchangeably for the 64 bit PC architecture and it does not matter which actual CPU is installed in your computer. The 64 bit version of tails is scheduled to be released June 2017 so the 32 bit version is all there is at the moment. And as you have discovered 32 bit versions will run on a 64 bit processor.
|
Thank you. Well, in that case I think I'll wait for June 2017.
It would be nice if Tails mentioned this simple but important point on their webpage.
Apart from this minor oversight, I'm sure we can all trust Tails OS.
Quote:
I can only guess that in the eyes of the authors the two download techniques provide suitable security measures to automatically download the ISO file.
|
I'm afraid that's a bullshit answer.
We are told Tails OS offers anonymity - but first we need to download a 3rd party app. You do the math.
|
|
|
03-18-2017, 04:02 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2016
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Jessie
Posts: 154
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ondoho
|
I don't use torrents because it's all a bit complicated.
Also, I read somewhere that torrents are spyware. Bingo.
Quote:
please be aware that tails is not meant to be installed, but always run from the live usb.
|
Thank you. That's good to know.
|
|
|
03-18-2017, 04:26 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2016
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Jessie
Posts: 154
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tk31337
No, either way it's x86. Likewise "amd64" packages will work on 64-bit Intel processors. It's all the same architecture.
|
That's weird. When installing debian, you have to choose between the Intel or the AMD .iso.
Tails OS is based on debian.
Quote:
Checksum only verifies that the file was downloaded without errors. The verification is about verifying the identity of who's providing you the download via public-key encryption, since hypothetically another site could offer you their own false MD5 checksum. (Of course at that point, one might be left to wonder how trustworthy this site is itself, but... *shrug*)
|
I see. So checksum verifies errors in software download but it does not verify the 'identity of who's providing you the download'.
I think we all know the 3rd party apps to authenticate the Tails OS is the Govt.
|
|
|
03-18-2017, 04:58 PM
|
#11
|
Moderator
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 26,213
|
Quote:
That's weird. When installing debian, you have to choose between the Intel or the AMD
|
When downloading debian your choosing between architectures (32 or 64 bit) not CPU manufactures. tails only has a 32 bit version.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
03-19-2017, 02:34 AM
|
#12
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpforprez
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelk
I can only guess that in the eyes of the authors the two download techniques provide suitable security measures to automatically download the ISO file.
|
I'm afraid that's a bullshit answer.
We are told Tails OS offers anonymity - but first we need to download a 3rd party app. You do the math.
|
- no it isn't. it's the answer that best fits the facts, whether one agrees with it or not.
- watch your tongue. why are you insulting people that are trying to help you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpforprez
I don't use torrents because it's all a bit complicated.
Also, I read somewhere that torrents are spyware.
|
yes, it's all a bit complicated.
but torrents aren't any ware, they're just files being shared. torrent software CAN be spyware, just like every other piece of software.
thankfully we use open source software where a thing like that wouldn't go unnoticed.
in other words: i know of NO linux torrent program that would be spyware.
Last edited by ondoho; 03-19-2017 at 02:35 AM.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
03-19-2017, 05:25 AM
|
#13
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
|
With all due respect, trumpforprez, I would suggest that you educate yourself a little more as it would help you in the long run:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amd64
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bittorrent
A quick google, duckduckgo, or look at Wikipedia would tell you what things like AMD64, i386 and the like mean and, also, tell you that torrents do not just contain malware -- that's usually people trying to download the latest blockbuster on Windows and finding they have a .exe file they are supposed to run in order to get it. Even if you're using Windows and download the worst malware out there fro ma torrent you still have to run it in order for it to cause you any issues.
The above said, I do think it odd that Tails isn't available for 64 bit architecture yet as it's not exactly a new thing.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
03-19-2017, 05:56 AM
|
#14
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273
I do think it odd that Tails isn't available for 64 bit architecture
|
the 32bit version will work just fine on 64bit architecture.
since tails is supposed to be always run from a usb stick, that way one doesn't have to worry about whether the host computer is 32 or 64bit.
|
|
|
03-19-2017, 06:09 AM
|
#15
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ondoho
the 32bit version will work just fine on 64bit architecture.
since tails is supposed to be always run from a usb stick, that way one doesn't have to worry about whether the host computer is 32 or 64bit.
|
True but since Tails is supposed to run from memory I would expect a 64 bit version to be able to have a larger RAM disk and take advantage of the extra instructions available on the AMD64 architecture.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|