Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi, I'm running Enlightenment on Fedora 16 and I'm experiencing freezes sometimes where the mouse becomes very laggy and system is completely unresponsive. It stays that way for ten mins. I experienced a freeze today and thought I would post from the logs here if anyone can tell me why the freezes are happening.
I copied these logs after the freeze as someone had told me before that it might be helpful to trace the root of the problem from these files. I'm fairly new to linux, but I hope someone can tell me how to resolve the freezing issue.
It seems that one of your disks has problems. Download the manufacturer's diagnosis tool and test your disk.
Hi TobiSGD. My hard disk is a very old Samsung drive, though the rest of the computer is quite new. Do you mean that the disk might be failing? I will search for the diagnosis tool but meanwhile I ran fsck and the partitions came out clean except I could not run it on /dev/sda3. So I fdisk -l'd and there does seem to be something wrong with the partition set up. It seems /dev/sda3 and /dev/sda5 are overlapping.
Code:
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 2048 12904367 6451160 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 39190528 41033727 921600 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda3 41046136 78236549 18595207 5 Extended
/dev/sda4 12904448 39190527 13143040 83 Linux
/dev/sda5 * 41046138 78236549 18595206 83 Linux
Do you think that could be causing the errors in the logs or is that issue something else? I'm not sure how to proceed next. Is there a non-destructive way to resolve this? And if not, how would I backup one of my partitions first? I have a very important archbang install on sda5. If I use dd to dump that partition to a usb drive, then format the hard disk, and use dd again to dump the partition back from the usb drive, would that be best or is formatting unnecessary? Also, would there be any problems using dd because the hard-drive partition size is bigger than the usb? Thanks for your help
There is nothing wrong with your partitioning, also that you couldn't fsck sda3 is normal. An extended partition, in your case sda3, is nothing more than a container for logical partitions (sda5 in your case), hence the overlapping. Nothing wrong with that, it is just a way to overcome limitations with the old-style partition tables (inherited from DOS).
If your Arch install is important to you then you should have a backup anyways, regardless if the machine misbehaves or not. Making a backup when there are issues is like fastening the seatbelt after you crashed into a wall.
Since Samsung has sold it's harddisk business to Seagate the appropriate tool for testing Samsung disks is Seatools: http://www.seagate.com/support/downloads/seatools/
Choose the DOS version and click on any Windows version in the drop-down-list, the OS question is meaningless here. This way you get a bootable iso-file.
There is nothing wrong with your partitioning, also that you couldn't fsck sda3 is normal. An extended partition, in your case sda3, is nothing more than a container for logical partitions (sda5 in your case), hence the overlapping. Nothing wrong with that, it is just a way to overcome limitations with the old-style partition tables (inherited from DOS).
If your Arch install is important to you then you should have a backup anyways, regardless if the machine misbehaves or not. Making a backup when there are issues is like fastening the seatbelt after you crashed into a wall.
Since Samsung has sold it's harddisk business to Seagate the appropriate tool for testing Samsung disks is Seatools: http://www.seagate.com/support/downloads/seatools/
Choose the DOS version and click on any Windows version in the drop-down-list, the OS question is meaningless here. This way you get a bootable iso-file.
Hi,
I didn't have a blank CDR yesterday so I ran smartctl's long test and that test came out fine. Today, I ran the SeaTools "Long Test" and it said that there was a bad sector that it was unsuccessful in repairing and the long test failed.
the results were:
Short DST = Passed
Long Test = Failed
and it told me to read the log. The log didn't have any other information, just that Long Test failed. I read on a website that if SeaTools throws up any error, I should get my drive replaced. Also, SeaTools recognized the disk as being from an unknown manufacturer. So - does my drive has a permanent issue and it must be replaced?
Modern drives with their enormous capacities sometimes have bad sectors. For this reason the drives have a spare area to "replace" bad sectors with working ones. This is done by the disks controller transparently, the user doesn't notice it. When Seatools comes up with bad sectors this means that the controller ran out of spare sectors, so that it couldn't replace the ones found by the diagnosis tools.
This is most of the time a symptom of a dying disk. I would recommend to replace that disk.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.