Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It's usual, though not compulsory, to have the /boot partition as about 50 - 100MB. Depending on your BIOS, boot loader and hard drive geometry it may even be compulsory to have a small boot partition right at the front of the drive.
If you REALLY want windows to view your /home partition you could format it as FAT32 (VFAT) and then both linux and windows can view it. I would steer clear of EXT2, it can be quite easy to corrupt if there's a power outage or you don't shut down correctly. I like reiser, but windows can't view that.
it is technically possible to acces reiser under windows, rfstool among others. but that's only technically. trying to access linux fs under windows is just a horrible idea, and should be avoided at all costs.
no idea how /boot is meant to fit into this though...
Done all of that. Just wanted to understand more to be extra definitive of my actions.
I just fell into a little trap a few weeks ago when I proceeded with creating all the partitions like /usr, /tmp because I read a tutorial and I went on with extracting the tarball to /mnt/usr blablabla and I received an error after 4 minutes of it copying files. So i'm just trying to do this again and see if the same thing happens while extracting to the /.
Originally posted by bluedevlx Done all of that. Just wanted to understand more to be extra definitive of my actions.
I just fell into a little trap a few weeks ago when I proceeded with creating all the partitions like /usr, /tmp because I read a tutorial and I went on with extracting the tarball to /mnt/usr blablabla and I received an error after 4 minutes of it copying files. So i'm just trying to do this again and see if the same thing happens while extracting to the /.
I think I'd have left a little more space on / because 2GB isn't gonna leave you much room to install software.
IMO, 100 megabytes for /boot is just wasting space. I made my 16 megabytes. I still have enough room for ramdisk images and kernels.
If you are dual booting between Windows and Linux, you do not need to make partition for /boot. Though if you are thinking to boot to multiple Linux distributions and Windows, you can make partition for /boot.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.