Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
02-06-2003, 02:47 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 214
Rep:
|
slow screen saver
ive just reinstalled linux (don't ask... i didnt like my partitioning), and this time i used the usb.i kernel, i think i used the bare.i kernel last time (maybe that had something to do with my usb mouse not working...erm). anyway, ive noticed that things are a bit slower than before. i use the matrix screensaver and previously you could watch it doing its stuff (its cool) nicely, but now it seems to be slower and looks as if its redrawing the entire screen when the stuff is moving down aevery bit. this is the only way ive noticed things to be going slower, ive just installed openoffice 2.0.2 (office xp was driving me crazy crashing twice inside a minute...pah! not good when trying to do final year uni project work) and it takes maybe 30secs to load, this seems a bit long too. mainly id appreciate any suggestions about the slowness ive noticed with the screensaver. (also... ho can i use one install of openoffice for all the users, it didnt come as a tar.gz which i would 'make all' so everyone could use it. its a wast of hd space to install it for each user.).
hope that made sense.
i wouldne mind keeping the usb kernel as ive got printer and scanner which i'd like to get running some day. is the usb kernel jsut slower?
|
|
|
02-06-2003, 02:48 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 214
Original Poster
Rep:
|
typo.. openoffice 1.0.2 NOT 2.0.2 (ha!)
|
|
|
02-06-2003, 06:11 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Slackware 10.0
Posts: 789
Rep:
|
I'm not in front of my Slackbox right now, so I can't check this suggestion, but is there a speed setting for the screensaver? Additionally, if you've got a slower processor and you're running a fairly bloated desktop environment (KDE or Gnome), this would probably slow it down considerably. If not, I'll try to check around on my box at home (I run Slackware 8.1 also and my matrix screensaver is fairly quick--even on a 266Mhz processor) to see what I can come up with.
|
|
|
02-06-2003, 07:05 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 214
Original Poster
Rep:
|
my sys is amd k6-2 500mhz 192mb ram, and the screen saver speed setting makes it no better. its just that it runs noticably slower than it used to. i run KDE3 and its set to absolute minimal setting (the wizard that popped up at first run i chose leftmost option , i.e. fastest (least bells & whistles)).
also, my system doesn't switch itself off like it used to either, it just says "power off" or something to that effect. that may have something to do with the usb kernel, or maybe i activated that sort of thing when i got the sound card going.
thanks.
|
|
|
02-06-2003, 07:49 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Slackware 10.0
Posts: 789
Rep:
|
I don't use the usb.i kernel so I'm not too sure about that. I know with the bare.i kernel I use, there's a way to make it power all the way down (mine's not set like that because I don't know how just yet). I'll look around on my box when I get home tonight to see if there's anything that could be causing the problem. Did you completely remove everything from your hard drive before you installed the usb.i kernel? Perhaps there were left over files that could be conflicting with your new setup. You might want to delete all your partitions completely, then reinstall your Slackware 8.1 from CD with your usb.i kernel. I might have better suggestions once I'm on my Slackbox.
|
|
|
02-07-2003, 09:04 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 214
Original Poster
Rep:
|
my system is completely clean, i deleted partitions and recreated them. i used the usb.i kernel from my slack8.1 cd. (it was a cover disk, single cd... could anyone tell me how much of slack i am missing because i not got 'official' full stuff, it has tonnes in it anyway).
|
|
|
02-07-2003, 03:38 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Slackware 10.0
Posts: 789
Rep:
|
I had a Slackware 8.1 iso a friend burned for me. Though it was only one disc, it came with LOTS of stuff on it. I still cannot figure out why it would be any slower with the usb.i kernel. It doesn't make any sense.
|
|
|
02-09-2003, 06:02 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 214
Original Poster
Rep:
|
hmm. thanks anyway. i'll just put up with it, for the time being unless i somehow maybe 'accidentally' fix it.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|