Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi
I was a die hard kde fan. When kde 4 was released, it was bloated and slow, and forced me to switch to gnome. When gnome 3 was released, it was also bloated and slow and forced me to switch to mate. Mate was not fulfilling my needs due to its simplicity so I switched to cinnamon, my current desktop.
Meanwhile, kde 5 was released and everyone is praising this 5th release of kde. Moreover, many surveys showed that kde is again #1 desktop in terms of users. I tried kde 5 many times but its still slow on my i5 laptop with 8GB ram. Even though I had disabled the desktop effects and whistles but still no use. Then I came across a forum post and among the answers, one strike me, which said:
Quote:
Maybe your distro includes those effects, whistles, background services etc. making your kde slow.
I think the same thing is happening here with me in arch linux. So my question is that can you recommend me a native kde distro which is not bloated with all those heavy effects, whistles, background services etc. and also and fast?
Regards
My kde 5 was slow too - plasma menu, pop-up menus and panels. I switched rendering backend to XRender from OpenGL and got plasma much faster.
May be it's your case too?
My kde 5 was slow too - plasma menu, pop-up menus and panels. I switched rendering backend to XRender from OpenGL and got plasma much faster.
May be it's your case too?
Meanwhile, I have been searching and find out that many articles have rated openSUSE as best candidate for KDE. I can try your suggestion after downloading/installing openSUSE.
Location: Montreal, Quebec and Dartmouth, Nova Scotia CANADA
Distribution: Arch, AntiX, ArtiX
Posts: 1,363
Rep:
Hey zerotrack000,
If you're unhappy with the performance of KDE (or any desktop environment, for that matter ...) on your system, why don't you just opt for a lightweight alternative ? When you say you abandoned Mate "due to its simplicity" - this seems to contradict your performance requirement.
You can customize any DE by adding any application you need. Regardless of the computer I use, I prefer LXDE with Arch since it is extremely lightweight and allows me to install only that which I need / want. The only time I use any other DE is when I require a HiDPI-enabled solution, and then I go (grudgingly) with either gnome or Cinnamon.
Already tried the first one. However, regarding gentoo... I have been using it few years back and now no plan to spend time in compiling packages again from source.
If you're unhappy with the performance of KDE (or any desktop environment, for that matter ...) on your system, why don't you just opt for a lightweight alternative ? When you say you abandoned Mate "due to its simplicity" - this seems to contradict your performance requirement.
You can customize any DE by adding any application you need. Regardless of the computer I use, I prefer LXDE with Arch since it is extremely lightweight and allows me to install only that which I need / want. The only time I use any other DE is when I require a HiDPI-enabled solution, and then I go (grudgingly) with either gnome or Cinnamon.
My 2 cents ....
I have to use external devices like usb and bluetooth sound cards, mifi, wireless headsets, and some other. KDE and Cinnamon are only two which properly switches to these hardware when plugged. However, on mate, lxde, fluxbox or any other lightweight desktop, you need to select and configure them everytime, which is painful. In summary, although these desktops are light on resources but they lack complete plug-n-play functionality.
Location: Montreal, Quebec and Dartmouth, Nova Scotia CANADA
Distribution: Arch, AntiX, ArtiX
Posts: 1,363
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by zetrotrack000
... In summary, although these desktops are light on resources but they lack complete plug-n-play functionality.
Gotcha. Well, if you haven't already done it, maxing out your RAM and switching to SSD will help performance (the SSD really does make a big difference - I've swapped them in on 2 of my laptops and it's given them a new lease on life).
Gotcha. Well, if you haven't already done it, maxing out your RAM and switching to SSD will help performance (the SSD really does make a big difference - I've swapped them in on 2 of my laptops and it's given them a new lease on life).
Best !
RAM is already at maximum which is 8GB. I didn't switch to SSD due to its very high price here in my country
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.