[SOLVED] Slackware, CentOS, Fedora, or Ubuntu? <Virtualization?>
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
After trying a test install of Ubuntu 9.10 over the weekend I just replaced my primary workstation Centos 5.4 OS with it. I have to say I am mightily impressed with Ubuntu 9.10. I have run various RedHat/RHEL versions beginning with RedHat 6.2 up to RHEL 4.x and then Centos 5.x. I also tried various Fedora versions but they were all too experimental and buggy for me. I stuck with RHEL and Centos OS versions for the stability they provided, but the downside of that stability is getting locked out of using some applications that require more recent kernel levels. My working system was Centos 5.4 x86-64 w/ WinXP as a KVM vm guest OS
I'm hopeful that using Ubuntu will keep me closer to the most recent kernel levels without it becoming a buggy sandbox. The only obvious thing I give up is running a 64bit type OS, and I'm not sure it really makes too much difference for me. I also now have a WinXP vm guest running great under VirtualBox (better than WinXP under KVM on Centos 5.4).
Ubuntu 9.10 just seems to be a better balance of up-to-date kernel & OS stability with a quite usable VM solution for my taste.
Hmm....I posted this 2 months ago.
I have Ubuntu and Arch in a dual-boot and have CentOS in a VM.
I'm very happy with this setup.
Why dig up old thread...I'm going to mark this as SOLVED.
I am very pleased with Arch and liked it a quite a bit more than Slackware...Ubuntu is a mainstay and CentOS/Fedora are fun to mess around with in a VM...
Thanks for those who helped, I must've not added proper closure to this thread.
Last edited by lupusarcanus; 01-19-2010 at 08:57 AM.
IMAO , the less "biased" Linux Distro nowadays, i.e. the more Unix Like is Slackware...
This means that, if you have no probl with Slackware, you should be just fine with any other Distro ( Exceptions made to "things" like BLFS... ), Ubuntu Lusty Lucifer, Red Hat, CentOS, Suse,... etc .
The opposite is not true... if you are fine with Ubuntu, does not mean you can do anything in Slackware...
If yo master KenJutsu, you have no problem with KenDo, mut it you master Kendo, you can probably be a n00b in KenJutsu...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.