Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
07-09-2006, 02:56 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: May 2006
Location: Atlanta
Distribution: WinXP, Ubuntu
Posts: 64
Rep:
|
Slack or Debian?
I am running a fairly old computer (specs are below) and so far I have been runnind Debian based distros. How does slack run on older hardware? Would it be worth switching? How easy is slack to use?
|
|
|
07-09-2006, 03:00 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
Slackware will work very well on your old hardware.
|
|
|
07-09-2006, 03:58 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,300
Rep:
|
Slack runs well on older hardware. As far as how easy is it to use, it's as easy to use as any other distro. Some of the configuration needs to be done manually, but it's no big deal. Just depends on your level of experience and how much you want to get your hands dirty. But Slack's rep for being difficult is really mostly a bunch of bull.
|
|
|
07-09-2006, 04:17 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by broknindarkagain
I am running a fairly old computer (specs are below) and so far I have been runnind Debian based distros. How does slack run on older hardware? Would it be worth switching? How easy is slack to use?
|
But then again ... given the fact that you're pretty much in an orbit around
debian (or its derivatives) there should be no problem with getting a minimum
install to run on it, either, specifically with DSL.
If you want a different kind of experience, if no hand-holding at all, manual
resolution of dependencies (mind you, I end up doing that on Debian bases
systems too, and it's harder than on slack ;}) and total control of your system
makes your heart go fonder, Slack is THE choice :}
Cheers,
Tink
|
|
|
07-09-2006, 10:19 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250
Rep:
|
I used to push Debian really hard, but finally realized that people who didn't understand it well enough to grasp why it's the best distro, really should play around with others until the Truth dawns.
Last edited by rickh; 07-09-2006 at 10:21 PM.
|
|
|
07-10-2006, 08:14 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: France, Provence
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 848
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
I used to push Debian really hard, but finally realized that people who didn't understand it well enough to grasp why it's the best distro, really should play around with others until the Truth dawns.
|
Couldn't have said it better !
|
|
|
07-10-2006, 08:49 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: The grassy knoll
Distribution: Slackware,Debian
Posts: 192
Rep:
|
I put Debian on an old 120mhz laptop a couple of weeks ago and it runs quite well.
Text console only, no room for X on its miniscule hard drive. My main gripe with Debian is that some packages get spewed all over the file system, e.g. Apache is divided up all over the place. /usr/lib/cgi-bin? Give me a break, please.
That being said I have Slackware-current on a 486 with X, apache, php, mysql. X is slow to start-up but runs tolerably well once it gets going. I wouldn't even consider trying to run something like the Gimp though. I stick to console mode 99% of the time but I prefer that no matter what the hardware situation.
Apache runs fine, but PHP and mysql stuff isn't what I would call snappy.
I recommend Slackware, ultimately. I got my loyalties to consider.
|
|
|
07-10-2006, 08:56 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Nashville
Distribution: Manjaro, RHEL, CentOS
Posts: 2,098
Rep:
|
I run both. Slackware on my laptop and Debian on a IBM Netfinity 5000 server at my house. I really suggest using which one is more suited to your needs. Both have great package managers. However I am more familiar with Slackware and prefer it more. For a window manager slackware comes with Fluxbox which in my opinion is a very fast window manager.
Give them both a try you can always blow it away and put another on their.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|