Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
All of a sudden my RH 9 installation is pausing at "Starting sendmail" for a long time and then at "Starting sm-client", boots up fine though but the wait is almost close to 3 minutes.
My question is, why would it want to wait so much and then have to ok it. Also, is this service absolutely required or can I just disable it?
Thanks for any assistance, as always you guys are real help.
You can disable this if you want. You would need sendmail running (or some other mail service) if you intend to receive and/or send mails. To disable sendmail on redhat do:
1. chkconfig sendmail off (this will not make sendmail run on startup)
2. service sendmail stop (to stop sendmail if it is running)
Very possible, I did change the "127.0.0.1 localhost" entry to "192.168.10.3 optiplex" to make it run on my network, I did then put in the 127 entry below the 192...
Update: Fixed, simply removed the 192 entry and it works like a charm. Thanks once again guys.
Update to the issue at hand, I fixed it by removing the 192.168.10.3 entry from hosts file, sendmail resolves and starts up fine but my httpd service is failing on boot up. It says
"httpd: Could not determine server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName" [FAILED]
and of course I can't pull pages from the machine.
That should work. If not, the issue is reverse zones. That will involve setting up dns, but I am pretty sure the resolution for optiplex to 127.0.0.1 will work out.
It seems like it worked when I did a service restart, I'm now rebooting.... I'm sure it'll work.
Man, it was that simple? It worked like a charm. I don't know why I have to learn something new everytime I do the same thing... oh well, something new learnt and gone into my log document.
Enlighten us. What was the problem? Your error message said
"Starting httpd2: httpd2: Could not determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName [FAILED]"
Well I figured out through my error log that for one of the Virtual Hosts I set up, that the error log file I had specified didn't exist yet. I created the file with appropriate privileges and apache was able to restart. A pretty simple problem to fix, but definitely didn't have anything to do with the FQDN message I was getting when trying to start apache.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.