Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I know we can create openssl certicate by myself rather than buy it from vendor , can advise what is the difference between these two methods ? the cert. that created by vendor is more security ?
A self generated cert won't cost you $5000. However browsers will notify users that the cert is self signed if it wasn't issued by a CA.
Since it is self-signed, you aren't providing reliable authorization and non-repudiation to the end user since they don't know if you really are who you claim. The connection will be secure, but the end user doesn't know if the connection is to who the believe it is.
A self generated cert won't cost you $5000. However browsers will notify users that the cert is self signed if it wasn't issued by a CA.
Since it is self-signed, you aren't providing reliable authorization and non-repudiation to the end user since they don't know if you really are who you claim. The connection will be secure, but the end user doesn't know if the connection is to who the believe it is.
Thx reply ,
I didn't have this experience , the $5,000 is for what cost ?
There are many uses and secure uses for a self signed certificate.
The normal use would be to physically send the certificate to the remote user.
A second instance is where you install it to the authorized computers.
You could fool with authentication but why if it is just for your security and not public. That really is the reason for a public certificate. That being anyone can have access to it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.