Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
11-08-2007, 02:39 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: London UK
Distribution: Fedora Core 17
Posts: 298
Rep:
|
sane: conflicting advice man sane-usb/howto
Have posted before but now have more info.
Artec E+Pro scanner, was previously detected by scanimage -L (but not available to sane) but now "no scanners detected". The tdlp howto was written in 2004 I think so treated as a starting point only. And "Therefore, for the rest of this article we assume the use of the kernel scanner driver (tdlp howto)." contrasted with "the kernel scanner driver is deprecated & shouldn't be used anymore (man sane-usb)" leaves me a bit confused- especially since man lib-usb doesn't tell me how to proceed if scanimage -L isn't working. Please suggest where to go for advice? Thanks
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 05:46 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: London UK
Distribution: Fedora Core 17
Posts: 298
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks, I have followed instructions to file a bug report on alioth.debian.org.
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 08:49 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Waiheke NZ
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,211
Rep:
|
For those who follow: when you are in the enviable position to select hardware for your linux box, it is good to make note of the selection at your retailer that interests you, then research them, before making your selection.
There is a very large amount of supported HW... had this scanner, for eg, been the next version, it would have worked. For some reason, retailers seem to stock the one model in the range which is like that - and at a low price.
Teaches you something about marketing...
|
|
|
11-10-2007, 09:52 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: London UK
Distribution: Fedora Core 17
Posts: 298
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for advice & will do so in future (bought this scanner long before I knew about Linux). Looking at the alioth site, I feel sure that this is not going to be a priority issue for them- there was only I previous bug report for an Artec scanner & it wasn't an E+pro so... to use my scanner for now it's back to XP on another box. Not a problem.
As an exercise I'd like to try & modify the backend driver. This might help me get over other usb hardware issues (i.e. the only problem I have with Debian). I can take a look at the Windows driver as a starting point. Could you suggest anything eg where to go for general (& hopefully newbie suitable)advice on driver files? Cheers.
|
|
|
11-10-2007, 10:38 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Waiheke NZ
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,211
Rep:
|
Go to the development site and use their source code... if you want to try modifying the driver, they really want to hear from you.
|
|
|
12-02-2007, 05:48 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: London UK
Distribution: Fedora Core 17
Posts: 298
Original Poster
Rep:
|
The solution
wasn't too much trouble in the end but the manuals and howtos weren't easy. /etc/sane.d/artec_eplus48u.conf pointed to /usr/share/sane/artec_eplus48u/1200.usb" which was not present, i.e. the windows firmware file mentioned briefly in manual pages from sane. I copied the file from my cd and made the required directory, & contacted sane with the result. Thanks for your help on this "project"!
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|