Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
07-02-2003, 11:26 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slack9, Red Hat 8.1
Posts: 117
Rep:
|
samba problem
allright, i had my samba configured. everything worked fine. now it doesn't. i don't know where else to look at for the problem. I checked it with and without my firewall running although it worked with my firewall running before. I checked my smbd.conf file to make sure nothing changed why it would i dont know. I also did the testparm command and it says everything is fine. My win2k machine sees the name of my slack9 machine when i go to computers near me but when i try to go to that machine and see my share it says that it is not accessible. Nothing at all has changed on either machine since last time i used it except maybe a reboot and i have installed ethereal on my slack9 machine since then. Other than that i cant figure out why it doesn't work all of the sudden. any ideas?
|
|
|
07-02-2003, 12:13 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slack9, Red Hat 8.1
Posts: 117
Original Poster
Rep:
|
when i do a "ps aux" i can see nmbd running but my smbd is not running anywhere. If smbd is not running then how come it says its running when i go to swat...status and how come it says its running in the log file. then if i type smbd and check the log file i see error messages where it couldn't bind to port 139 because it is in use, probably by the smbd already but something isn't making a connection here. i can view all the packets using ethereal but i don't understand what all that means yet because i am just starting to learn all that.
|
|
|
07-02-2003, 12:30 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slack9, Red Hat 8.1
Posts: 117
Original Poster
Rep:
|
should i see smbd running when i do a "ps aux" if it is in fact running?
|
|
|
07-02-2003, 01:00 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 117
Rep:
|
Do you have samba set to startup when you turn on your computer? If not type "smbd -D nmbd -D" in the conmsole.
|
|
|
07-02-2003, 01:04 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slack9, Red Hat 8.1
Posts: 117
Original Poster
Rep:
|
yes it should be set up to start, also in swat it says they are both running, however, when i do ps aux i see nmbd but not smbd
|
|
|
07-02-2003, 01:18 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slack9, Red Hat 8.1
Posts: 117
Original Poster
Rep:
|
funny thing is i can see nmbd running when i do ps aux but swat says its not running, i cant see smbd running when i do ps aux but swat says it is. I had no problem ftp'ing in and getting the file i wanted. i have no trouble pinging or ssh'ing in. I am about ready to say fuc|< samba and ftp and just limit everything to ssh since it is the only secure thing between all of them anyway and what do ya know i get half the responses when i search for posts/problems setting up ssh vs. ftp servers or samba!!
|
|
|
07-02-2003, 01:35 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slack9, Red Hat 8.1
Posts: 117
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thankyou for the thousands of responses, but i am saying fuck samba!!! I closed everything down except ssh and since i can do that on my win2k machine i am deleting this samba shit since noone knows anything about it and i dont really need it.
|
|
|
07-02-2003, 01:45 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: MANDRAKE-REDHAT
Posts: 70
Rep:
|
try this command ]smb restart
then ] smb status
return should be - smbd running
nmbd running
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|