Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am trying to get a Samba server going on home linux machine (Red Hat 9) named "boneset".
Having, as far as I can tell, configured Samba properly on boneset, if I look at it from a second linux box (named "yarrow" and running RH7.3, both on home network) with nmap, nmap shows all ports from 135-140 are closed on boneset.
(Samba is running okay on yarrow and from boneset nmap announces that 139 is open on yarrow, and in fact I can use Samba on boneset to browse yarrow.)
*** Question:
Does this mean that the ports have not been opened because of some security settings which I don't know about, or is it just telling me in a different way that the Samba server isn't working right?
To re-ask the question backwards :-) would having Samba running right automatically open port 139?
Obviously, I am asking if I should approach this as a firewall problem or a Samba problem.
I'm pretty sure you'll have to open port 139 in the firewall, if you have the firewall protecting your computer from tne network over which you want to share files. Certainly, according to my fw config file:
Quote:
# set to "yes" if this server is running a samba server. You still have to
# open the tcp port 139 to allow remote access to SAMBA.
FW_SERVICE_SAMBA="no"
It's set to "no" on my PC because I connect to my other PCs via a different interface than my internet connection (the LAN connection is not protected by the firewall)
I'm pretty sure you'll have to open port 139 in the firewall, if you have the firewall protecting your computer from tne network over which you want to share files. Certainly, according to my fw config file:
It's set to "no" on my PC because I connect to my other PCs via a different interface than my internet connection (the LAN connection is not protected by the firewall)
Yours,
Rob
Thanks.
So I will just focus on figuring out how to do this with RH 9.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.