Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
12-15-2003, 09:33 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Boondocks USA
Distribution: RH9
Posts: 50
Rep:
|
RH9, Gateway Solo 2500 Notebook - Need Speed Tips
Hi. Just installed RH9 on an old Gateway Solo 2500 laptop that has 64 MB RAM, 300 MHz processor, and no surprises otherwise. This is my second linux installation, and it went off just fine.
I'm not happy with the performance of RH9 on the laptop, however. Everything is very sluggish: windows take forever to close/open, even bringing up a file in vi or emacs takes a few minutes. I'm planning on using the machine for emacs, email, and some light MATLAB/Maple work, but I'm starting to wonder if I wasn't expecting too much from RH9.
Any tips on how to get RH9 and everything else running better are greatly appreciated. Currently investigating each process listed in 'System Monitor', which is consuming too much time. As it stands, System Monitor indicates that the CPU uses an average of 45% just to keep RH9 running with XWindows and GNOME. Throw the CPU needed for the System Monitor in there, and that machine is maxed out when I want to know what's going on with the background processes.
Just want to get this to be a stable machine that doesn't take forever to boot up and run programs. Thanks.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 11:34 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Montego Bay, Jamaica
Posts: 10
Rep:
|
I also have SuSE 9.0 install on a Gateway 2500, and it runs fast. Try and increasing your memeory. I had 96MB and it did run sluggish, then I bought a 128MB stick and now it flys, planning to buy another 128 soon, and I should be happy...(my 2500 can only accept 256MB in the slots)
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 12:27 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Boondocks USA
Distribution: RH9
Posts: 50
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Okay, andy, I might try that. Thanks
Only thing that strikes me as odd is that Win98, while sluggish, wasn't nearly as bad as RH9 with only 64 MB of RAM to play with.
Looks like 128 MB RAM is relatively cheap, though, so maybe I'll give it a shot.
If anybody else knows of any tweaks to RH9 itself, please share. I'm still looking for tips and coming up empty handed through google.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 02:21 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Gentoo 2004.0
Posts: 157
Rep:
|
have you tried using blackbox or another window manager? is it still sluggish then?
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|