Returning to UNIX philosophy basics
When I started to learn Linux/BSD/UNIX systems I didn't had such a deep idea or philosophy which I have now, but I still not that good learner, that's why I need your help to strengthen my ability to "market" the UNIX, for this purposes I need to know deeper, what's UNIX or Linux's about.
In this topic I'm just asking you to mention your reasons why are you fan of Linux. Let me become Linux fan too. First off let me tell what do I think about this: 1. Its definitely flexible, but it takes a lots of skills to operate any task on it (not user friendly) 2. Its stable, but still sometimes slower than some versions of Windows. 3. Its stable and flexible, but sometimes different distributions bring more confusion. When you learn Linux/BSD, your time multiplies on variety of software, on difficulty of its installation & operation and all of it multiplies on quantity of distributions which not makes the process of learning how to work with that, easier. According to this 3 statements I come to these conclusions: - You should have developer-oriented mind and good memory / organizational skills to operate Linux-machines, plus a lots of times and nerves to get through all the toughness of the situations Linux has to offer us. - I've got personal opinion that I have to stick to one Linux distribution and never change it, but I have chosen it yet, because with switching jobs there comes necessity to learn new Linux distributions which I try to avoid. -- According to the previous opinion as a user environment I for my user experience I choose Mac OS X and iOS systems, because they're also based on BSD, and if it was up to me, I would used them everywhere for narrowing quantity of distributions to one (I give my choice to Mac OS because its user experience developed by Apple's money, therefore it means that this distribution got the most time spent on) - According to my previous experience, MS Windows operating systems work better with broken hardware (you'll say that the place of broken hardware is the trash, but I kinda like reusing it sometimes), so it makes me feel that because of that Linux is limited. - Linux is about free software, but I hate the fact that there's still lots of space for optimization. My best friend/ASM-programmer&pedantic-code-optimizer told me that if you will compare Windows core & Linux programming core, then you will find out that even though Windows is not flexible and not stable, it has much more optimized code (in terms of performance and quantity of diskspace which the core programs take on HDD) And that's why for now my old laptop still has Windows XP, and using Linux machines for my business needs & at my job, while dreaming about Mac. What do you think about all these things? Can you tell me something which could stop me from using my Windows and dreaming about Mac immediately? :) (I want to believe in Linux the same way some of my friends do) Do you have some opposite facts to the ones I've mentioned? I would be glad to hear any thoughts why Linux matters the most for you, and why my thoughts aren't right. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
jlinkels |
Quote:
|
Indeed :)
I was just pointing out that its not just a Linux issue..., see also jlinkels' comment, which applies to most users regardless of OS. ;) |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Is the purpose of this thread to start some flaming fire?
|
Quote:
|
OK, my two cents about this, assuming that you mean the OS with Linux, not the kernel:
Quote:
This is about administration, end user tasks are basically the same, there is no difference in using Firefox, OpenOffice or GIMP in Linux compared to Windows. Quote:
Quote:
This may be different if you are a system administrator, but as such you are paid to do your job and have to learn it anyways. Quote:
Quote:
But there is a different thing that makes having the choice an advantage. Let's assume that Microsoft or Apple make a design decision for their OS that changes the OS in a way that you don't like, like Windows Metro for example. You can't simply change to a different Windows version or a different MacOS X/iOS version. But if that happens to users of a Linux distribution they can simply change to a distribution that handles things to their likings. Quote:
Regarding the amount of time spent by developers for the OS, there are hundreds, if not thousands developers working just on the core of Linux and many developers working on every aspect of it. This leads also to some kind of competition, where different developers have different ideas for the same part of the OS (like Upstart and systemd). Competition is good, since it leads to better optimized software, but since this is open source also to the incorporation of ideas from different projects. Compare that to the development model of company driven closed source OSes, where the design department (or even the marketing people) design the OS and the developers have to implement that. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
1. Throw it away. 2. Upgrade the hardware, if possible, to a state that it can run a newer Windows version and purchase a license for that version. 3. Install a lightweight Linux distribution for free and use it for a few more years. Basically, it comes down to this: Nothing that we will write here should make you to change your OS. The OS is a personal thing, like a car is. You should test-drive all options that you have and decide for yourself which OS is the one that fits you best. If you are fine with Windows than so it shall be, if you like MacOS X use that. Just keep in mind that you are free at any time to test again and may be change your mind. I, and most others here, have made my test-drives and have decided which OS is the best for me and for me the best currently is Linux. This may change in the future, may be I change to BSD, may be a new OS appears on the horizon, who can know that. Now it is up to you, have a nice ride. P.S.: My Unix/BSD experience is rather limited, but I am pretty sure that most of my thoughts/opinions about Linux also apply to them. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 AM. |