Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
01-31-2017, 01:08 PM
|
#16
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,940
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne
Good luck. The OP was pointed there before, but still doesn't seem to get that unless these 'admins' (who apparently can't be trusted not to reboot a live server without good cause, or run fsck on a mounted volume) are restricted to an incredibly small set of commands (and are locked out of the server room), that there is no real solution for their "management official reasons" request.
They don't seem to realize that: - If they can get into the server room, they can log in as root on a console and do whatever they want
- If they can get into the server room, they can UNPLUG the server physically and reboot it (negating the first "official reason" of "not allowed to reboot")
- If they can reboot the server they can also boot it to single-user mode and fsck anything (negating the second "official reason" of "not allowed to fsck")
- That if they have ANY sort of sudo rights past a few commands, they can get in as root and do anything (negating BOTH points)
- That if they have ANY sort of sudo rights past a few commands, they can reset system time to avoid the "official restrictions" on hours those things can be done (negating points 1 and 2 as before)
..which brings things full-circle to what cynwolf said, and I agree with: it's all about trust. If these 'admins' are too stupid to know not to do these things, or just don't care, then they do not need to be admins and/or have admin rights, it's that simple. But the OP says that we someone 'don't understand' these issues.
|
Absolutely correct. In a secure domain the first level of protection is physical access. Once that is granted, many bets are off; however the point here is "granted" versus "compromised".
Part of granting is also giving trust to those persons. If they are not worthy of trust, then they should not be granted access and privileges.
|
|
|
01-31-2017, 01:10 PM
|
#17
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
|
I want to know which company the OP works for as if it's one I'm paying for hosting I want a refund and a move to another.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|