Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am trying to install RED HAT 9 in my machine. While booting from the CD it is showing as the error No driver found Unable to find any devices of the type needed for this installation type.
Would you like to manually select your driver or use a driver disk?
Select driver|||||||| Use a driver disk|||||| Back
I have changed the SATA mode to IDE still the error is coming. Please suggest me..
You might be able to get more information if you switch to your other virtual terminals by pressing CTL-ALT-F1 through F8. If you can provide us with some more info maybe we can help.
Dear bro,
I knew it is an older one. But now am trying to install that, but i am unable.
Please suggest me the solution for that...
You will have considerable trouble installing it, if you even can especially if you are using a newr computer. This posting shows the end of life for that product was 2004. Distributions can not see into the future and provide modern drivers
You might be better served using a recent version of CentOS a free to us Red Hat clone.
If your plans are to use the Red Hat 9 for preparation for exams or such; I think you would be wasting your time. Best to go with CentOS or but the Red Hat subscription.
Dear bro,
I knew it is an older one. But now am trying to install that, but i am unable.
Please suggest me the solution for that...
Simple: install the LATEST VERSION.
There is no solution for this. An 11 year old operating system does not have ANY idea about the drivers/hardware of a modern system. So, wifi, bluetooth, sound, hard drives/controllers will either not work AT ALL, or take a LOT of effort to make work, if it's even possible. So, download Fedora 18 (since there [B]IS NO RED HAT distro any longer...that's how old that distro is), and move forward.
Dear bro,
I knew it is an older one. But now am trying to install that, but i am unable.
Please suggest me the solution for that...
he did suggest you a solution. the solution is to either use a computer from the time frame of Red Hat 9 was actively supported, OR as you have been told many times use a more modern distro. Those are the ONLY two solutions.
Every once and a while a ancient OS dose need to be used ( legacy support for old proprietary code )
for that a VM install is needed
or
very old hardware
Every once and a while a ancient OS dose need to be used ( legacy support for old proprietary code )
for that a VM install is needed
or
very old hardware
Yes you are right,I have installed RH 9 in VM itself without any errors
Yes you are right,I have installed RH 9 in VM itself without any errors
So does that mean that you have old, proprietary code that will work ONLY on RH 9? Since, if you have very old hardware, it probably wouldn't support a VM, and wouldn't NEED to, since the hardware would be as old as the OS?
If so, it would have helped if you had told us this at the beginning. And even if you succeed at this, you do realize it's totally pointless, right?? All you're doing is putting off dealing with a VERY serious problem. That problem is, old code that hasn't been updated. It's been 11 years for that OS...that's MORE than enough time, for pretty much any language. And unless it's doing something very hardcore, and very intertwined with the kernel, there's not much you should have to change.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.