LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-09-2013, 04:21 AM   #1
yashfire007
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2013
Distribution: CentOS, RHEL 6.4
Posts: 79

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Unhappy RedHat 9 installation error


Dear all,

I am trying to install RED HAT 9 in my machine. While booting from the CD it is showing as the error
No driver found
Unable to find any devices of the type needed for this installation type.
Would you like to manually select your driver or use a driver disk?


Select driver|||||||| Use a driver disk|||||| Back


I have changed the SATA mode to IDE still the error is coming. Please suggest me..
 
Old 03-09-2013, 04:24 AM   #2
knudfl
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Copenhagen DK
Distribution: PCLinuxOS2023 Fedora38 + 50+ other Linux OS, for test only.
Posts: 17,511

Rep: Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641
RedHat 9 is 11 years old.

Will usually require a computer from say 2002 or older.
 
Old 03-09-2013, 04:31 AM   #3
yashfire007
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2013
Distribution: CentOS, RHEL 6.4
Posts: 79

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by knudfl View Post
RedHat 9 is 11 years old.

Will usually require a computer from say 2002 or older.


Dear bro,
I knew it is an older one. But now am trying to install that, but i am unable.
Please suggest me the solution for that...
 
Old 03-09-2013, 06:00 AM   #4
samBl
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 31

Rep: Reputation: 1
You might be able to get more information if you switch to your other virtual terminals by pressing CTL-ALT-F1 through F8. If you can provide us with some more info maybe we can help.
 
Old 03-09-2013, 06:05 AM   #5
jkirchner
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Pop!_OS
Posts: 945

Rep: Reputation: 297Reputation: 297Reputation: 297
Quote:
Originally Posted by yashfire007 View Post
Dear bro,
I knew it is an older one. But now am trying to install that, but i am unable.
Please suggest me the solution for that...
You will have considerable trouble installing it, if you even can especially if you are using a newr computer. This posting shows the end of life for that product was 2004. Distributions can not see into the future and provide modern drivers

You might be better served using a recent version of CentOS a free to us Red Hat clone.

If your plans are to use the Red Hat 9 for preparation for exams or such; I think you would be wasting your time. Best to go with CentOS or but the Red Hat subscription.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-09-2013, 06:12 AM   #6
schillache
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I too facing the same issue :-(
 
Old 03-09-2013, 09:37 AM   #7
TB0ne
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 26,623

Rep: Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964
Quote:
Originally Posted by yashfire007 View Post
Dear bro,
I knew it is an older one. But now am trying to install that, but i am unable.
Please suggest me the solution for that...
Simple: install the LATEST VERSION.

There is no solution for this. An 11 year old operating system does not have ANY idea about the drivers/hardware of a modern system. So, wifi, bluetooth, sound, hard drives/controllers will either not work AT ALL, or take a LOT of effort to make work, if it's even possible. So, download Fedora 18 (since there [B]IS NO RED HAT distro any longer...that's how old that distro is), and move forward.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-10-2013, 05:58 AM   #8
chrism01
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Rocky 9.2
Posts: 18,356

Rep: Reputation: 2751Reputation: 2751Reputation: 2751Reputation: 2751Reputation: 2751Reputation: 2751Reputation: 2751Reputation: 2751Reputation: 2751Reputation: 2751Reputation: 2751
As above, RH9 is long DEAD. Get latest Centos (v6.4) a free copy of RHEL.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centos
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-10-2013, 11:45 AM   #9
lleb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Distribution: CentOS/Fedora/Pop!_OS
Posts: 2,983

Rep: Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by yashfire007 View Post
Dear bro,
I knew it is an older one. But now am trying to install that, but i am unable.
Please suggest me the solution for that...
he did suggest you a solution. the solution is to either use a computer from the time frame of Red Hat 9 was actively supported, OR as you have been told many times use a more modern distro. Those are the ONLY two solutions.
 
Old 03-10-2013, 02:07 PM   #10
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600
Quote:
Originally Posted by lleb View Post
Those are the ONLY two solutions.
For him it may be but virtualization is the third option. A while back I installed and ran RHL 7.3 pretty much OK in VMWare Server.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-10-2013, 03:12 PM   #11
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,623

Rep: Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651
Every once and a while a ancient OS dose need to be used ( legacy support for old proprietary code )
for that a VM install is needed
or
very old hardware
 
Old 03-10-2013, 03:43 PM   #12
lleb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Distribution: CentOS/Fedora/Pop!_OS
Posts: 2,983

Rep: Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551
yes a VM would work, but only if he has a functioning OS to start with that can run the VM software. That is correct, i stand corrected.
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:24 PM   #13
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600
Quote:
Originally Posted by lleb View Post
yes a VM would work, but only if he has a functioning OS to start with that can run the VM software.
There's always a catch isn't it? ;-p


Anyway, options aside, I agree this should be the preferred approach for the OP:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkirchner View Post
You might be better served using a recent version of CentOS, a free to use Red Hat clone.
 
Old 03-11-2013, 02:57 AM   #14
yashfire007
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2013
Distribution: CentOS, RHEL 6.4
Posts: 79

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by John VV View Post
Every once and a while a ancient OS dose need to be used ( legacy support for old proprietary code )
for that a VM install is needed
or
very old hardware


Yes you are right,I have installed RH 9 in VM itself without any errors
 
Old 03-11-2013, 08:47 AM   #15
TB0ne
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 26,623

Rep: Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964Reputation: 7964
Quote:
Originally Posted by yashfire007 View Post
Yes you are right,I have installed RH 9 in VM itself without any errors
So does that mean that you have old, proprietary code that will work ONLY on RH 9? Since, if you have very old hardware, it probably wouldn't support a VM, and wouldn't NEED to, since the hardware would be as old as the OS?

If so, it would have helped if you had told us this at the beginning. And even if you succeed at this, you do realize it's totally pointless, right?? All you're doing is putting off dealing with a VERY serious problem. That problem is, old code that hasn't been updated. It's been 11 years for that OS...that's MORE than enough time, for pretty much any language. And unless it's doing something very hardcore, and very intertwined with the kernel, there's not much you should have to change.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
redhat installation error oraclemanju Red Hat 2 02-29-2008 09:27 AM
Redhat 9 installation error rowellski Linux - Hardware 14 07-26-2007 10:34 PM
redhat 8 installation error netguy2000 Red Hat 4 08-24-2004 10:56 PM
RedHat 9.0 Installation Error Terrorix Linux - Newbie 21 02-02-2004 02:09 PM
Error during Installation of Redhat Xetox Linux - Newbie 2 08-06-2003 02:33 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration