LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-14-2014, 10:18 PM   #1
ryanaud
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Red Hat vs Ubuntu


What operating system is better? I understand there are some advantages/disadvantages to both.
 
Old 10-14-2014, 10:31 PM   #2
evo2
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Mostly Debian and Scientific Linux
Posts: 5,753

Rep: Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288
Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanaud View Post
What operating system is better?
Better at what?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanaud View Post
I understand there are some advantages/disadvantages to both.
Yes, that's true.

Evo2.
 
Old 10-14-2014, 10:47 PM   #3
Ztcoracat
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,868
Blog Entries: 10

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanaud View Post
What operating system is better? I understand there are some advantages/disadvantages to both.
Red Hat is a server class distribution for the enterprise. Red Hat is not free; you have to purchase a contract/subscription.
Red Hat has a entirely different package management (yum) system that Ubuntu.
The people that I conduct professional business with are very pleased with RH and it is stable & secure. Here the disadvantage is if your enterprise isn't returning a profit that the subscription fee would be more of a burdened expense.
-:CentOS is the free version of Red Hat:-
http://www.redhat.com/en/services/support

Ubuntu is a distribution that you can use for home use but you can also set it up for a server.
Ubuntu has it's own package management system (Ubuntu Software Center) or you can use the commandline utility (apt) that comes with Ubuntu to install software.
http://www.ubuntu.com/server

The only disadvantages that I experienced with Ubuntu was I found that the Unity launcher had a bug.
Known issues that are related to the Ubuntu os are listed in the Release Notes.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/R...s#Known_issues
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes
 
Old 10-14-2014, 11:17 PM   #4
haertig
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, LinuxMint, Slackware, SysrescueCD, Raspbian
Posts: 2,207

Rep: Reputation: 341Reputation: 341Reputation: 341Reputation: 341
Big companies like to pay for things, and since Open Source is free, they tend to shun it for proprietary offerings. Lawyers tell them this is the correct thing to do. But since Linux itself is free, that doesn't work out so well. So they do the next best thing - they pay for RedHat. What you're buying there is paid support for a free OS. But it meets their needs to "pay for something". Nothing wrong with RedHat. It's the bee's knee's if you want to pay money. It's not really any better or more robust than most other flavors of Linux. But if you want to pay, it's one of the few options that allows you to do that. That's why you see it more in the corporate world than in the home user world. "People in groups tend to make decisions that, as individuals, they know are stupid." But that describes big corporations to a tee. Hence the dominance of Red Hat in the corporate world. Also, if your companies sysadmins are morons (unfortunately, this can be common), Red Hat is very good for your business. You can call Red Hat for support when your sysadmins forget, for example, how to delete a file.

Don't think that I'm against Red Hat. It is a very good distro of Linux. It is in use by my company. I just personally don't see a need to pay for something when you can get equivalent things that are just as good for free. Many people here on LQ.org have every bit as much experience and knowledge as RedHat support people. And they will help you for free.
 
Old 10-15-2014, 11:58 AM   #5
DavidMcCann
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 4,674

Rep: Reputation: 1485Reputation: 1485Reputation: 1485Reputation: 1485Reputation: 1485Reputation: 1485Reputation: 1485Reputation: 1485Reputation: 1485Reputation: 1485
If you're talking about setting up a server in a business, both Ubuntu and Red Hat are used by many companies: the New York Stock Exchange has Red Hat, Google has Ubuntu. Both offer a paid-for support service: with Ubuntu it's optional, with Red Hat the free one is called CentOS.

For a desktop computer, the differences are
1. support period: 10 years for Red Hat, 5 for Ubuntu long-term support
2. available software: lots of programs for Ubuntu, but the tiny repositories for Red Hat/CentOS generally need to supplemented from repositories like EPEL, rpmfusion, etc
3. gui: Red Hat/CentOS has Gnome or KDE, Ubuntu has Unity, Gnome, KDE, Xfce, or LXDE. (Before anyone says you can install Xfce on Red Hat/CentOS, they should try it and discover the consequences!)
4. the configuration tools in a graphical environment are better in Red Hat.
 
Old 10-15-2014, 04:35 PM   #6
joe_2000
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Aachen, Germany
Distribution: Void, Arch, Debian
Posts: 843

Rep: Reputation: 242Reputation: 242Reputation: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by haertig View Post
Many people here on LQ.org have every bit as much experience and knowledge as RedHat support people. And they will help you for free.
While that is certainly true none of them will promise you to fix your problem in a previously defined time frame. In a support contract you can include things like that. If you are in a business where server down times are *really* expensive or even worse, put peoples' lifes at risk, you cannot afford depending on LQ.org members' good will to help you when it suits them. You need someone that you can sue because he did fix your issue on time.
 
Old 10-15-2014, 06:13 PM   #7
haertig
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, LinuxMint, Slackware, SysrescueCD, Raspbian
Posts: 2,207

Rep: Reputation: 341Reputation: 341Reputation: 341Reputation: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe_2000 View Post
You need someone that you can sue because he did fix your issue on time.
Even better is to design your critical systems around redundancy/failover/fallback/recovery. Putting all your eggs in one basket, and planning to sue if your service contract can't get that basket running in a timely manner, is very poor business management. Bordering on "felony stupid", IMHO.
 
Old 10-16-2014, 02:41 PM   #8
joe_2000
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Aachen, Germany
Distribution: Void, Arch, Debian
Posts: 843

Rep: Reputation: 242Reputation: 242Reputation: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by haertig View Post
Putting all your eggs in one basket, and planning to sue if your service contract can't get that basket running in a timely manner, is very poor business management. Bordering on "felony stupid", IMHO.
Agreed. However, to use your terms, I would consider the fallback plan to have someone you can sue as one basket more that you put your eggs in.
 
Old 10-17-2014, 09:34 PM   #9
Fred Caro
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 999

Rep: Reputation: 166Reputation: 166
ryanuad,
what do you want to do, run an o/s on a business basis or a pc? Notice it is not between Ubuntu and Red Hat but Debian and Red Hat, as Ubuntu would struggle without Debian.

Fred.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Red Hat OpenShift Marketplace Aims to Suceed where Red Hat Exchange Failed LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-14-2014 06:32 PM
LXer: Red Hat releases upgrade to older Red Hat Enterprise Linux: RHEL 5.10 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-02-2013 05:10 AM
LXer: Red Hat Announces General Availability of Next Minor Release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-22-2013 02:50 PM
[UBUNTU] mount.nfs fails in Ubuntu / Works on Red Hat!!! kristo5747 Linux - Newbie 2 08-16-2010 12:57 PM
LXer: Red Hat Summit 2007, Day 2: Red Hat Exchange and interesting presentations LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-11-2007 08:32 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration