Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have recently deleted my W$ndows partition and installed Xubuntu on my Lenovo Lenovo-B40-80 i3 250ssd and 16gb of ram. I would like to install a virtual host on Xubuntu to run a version of W$ndows. I have read that Virtual Box is good but a bit slow.
Sure. What would you like advice about? Have you a question?
I have used VirtualBox, and if you have fast enough iron and enough resources it is fast enough. If not, nothing is going to be a LOT better.
VMWARE can do a LITTLE better, but only the paid products do enough better to be more useful. VMWARE is a bit harder to manage than VirtualBox, but not enough to rule either out. I have heard that XEN and KVM can also do the job, but I have not tried them myself.
I'm not a big user of virtual, but have recently tried to get an old XP I want to keep running under Hyper-V on Win10 and KVM on Fedora 25. Ran much better on the latter although less than half the machine (a 6 year old laptop in fact).
I have used VBox in the past too, and it did fine for my modest needs (no 3D graphics, no heavy loads).
Try and see - easy enough to uninstall everything and try something else.
wpeckham: well, advice choosing a good Linux VM host. Yeah, I found that the VMplayer pro is about $150.. I have tried XEN and KVM before but I had a few issues running slow. Thank you for your reply.
Syg00: Thank you for your reply. I will give Virtual box and KVM a go. I will be running Windows 10 therefore, since the O/S must be activated I wanted to avoid activating the copy twice. (One on VirtualBox and the other one on KVM.) I'll give it a try. Thank you!
With XP I didn't give it network access - so it couldn't activate. It complained about the change in hardware, and had a 3 day grace period. This was an image I had carved from a real XP install - M$oft tool; disk2vhd. I don't know about fresh install, but same idea should work to give you an idea of how it might run. If no good, simply delete and no-one is the wiser.
I installed Virtual Box and created a Windows 10 guest. It is working fine. I noticed a little bit of lag when for example, my host O/S locks due to time out then I login and click on the running VM. after a few seconds it becomes responsive again.
I could def live with this lag.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.