Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
05-01-2012, 02:43 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: northern michigan usa
Distribution: Debian Squeeze, Whezzy, Jessie
Posts: 921
Rep:
|
putting packages on hold
I am trying to build an external firewall/nat/dns box.
No gui.
The depends are dragging in x11-common, apache, mysql and who knows what else. I can apt-get remove <package> but the next time I update the system they will be pulled back in.
I have been told that I can just put a hold on the packages and that will solve my problem. But I have to question that, as I think if memory serves, putting a package on hold prevents the package that depends on it from being updated too.
Can anyone confirm one way or the other for me?
Some google results indicate that putting a package on hold will prevent other packages from being update. But most don't even discuss the issue.
Thanks.
|
|
|
05-01-2012, 04:47 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2010
Location: Palm Island
Distribution: RHEL, CentOS, Debian, Oracle Solaris 10
Posts: 1,420
|
Last edited by Satyaveer Arya; 05-01-2012 at 04:51 PM.
|
|
|
05-01-2012, 05:15 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: northern michigan usa
Distribution: Debian Squeeze, Whezzy, Jessie
Posts: 921
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks Satyaveer Arya,
I have already read that page and it confirms that when I hold one package all that depend on it get held too.
So if I hold x11-common, which provides file structure for the xserver, I hold lsb-base which is pulled in by sed and ncurses-bin inturn by install-info, libselinux1, libncurses5 inturn by libgpm2
I'm just guessing that the system will not work without a couple of those and libc6 is not included in the output of debtree
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|