Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
how do I check if xgraph is working properly or not? I got the below lines after typing the commaned - sudo apt-get install xgraph:
xyz@xyz-Presario-V3000-GN367PA-ACJ:~$ sudo apt-get install xgraph
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
xgraph is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 288 not upgraded.
how do I check if xgraph is working properly or not? I got the below lines after typing the command - sudo apt-get install xgraph:
xyz@xyz-Presario-V3000-GN367PA-ACJ:~$ sudo apt-get install xgraph
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
xgraph is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 288 not upgraded.
When I ran ./validate, I got the below test failed:
validate overall report: some tests failed:
./test-all-newreno ./test-all-red ./test-all-jobs
to re-run a specific test, cd tcl/test; ./test-all-TEST-NAME
Notice that some tests in webcache will fail on freebsd when -O is turned on.
This is due to some event reordering, which will disappear when -g is turned on.
xyz@xyz-Presario-V3000-GN367PA-ACJ:~/ns-allinone-2.28/ns-2.28$
Does it matter, if few of the tests are failed? Well, I tried validating the three test separately but even then it failed!!!
Also, do you have any idea on how a WiMAX module can be installed on ns-2.28? I have the module with me. I am facing the error during make clean.
Some few tests failing : If you are not using the concerned protocols,
your ns-2.28 will do OK, I guess.
Anyway it is the best Ubuntu result, I have seen.
Ref. post #10 in the above link.
OK. Do you have any idea on how a WiMAX module can be installed on ns-2.28? I have the module with me. I am facing the error during make clean.
The procedure I followed are as follows:
1) From the WiMAX module folder >> mac folder, copied the files into ns-2.28 >> mac folder
2) From the WiMAX module folder >> tcl and common folder, copied the files into ns-2.28 >> tcl and common folder respectively
3) opened the Makefile.in in ns-2.28
4) Added the below lines after the sentence mac/mac-802_3.o add:
mac/mac-802_16-base.o mac/mac-802_16-ss.o mac/mac-802_16-bs.o \
mac/mac-802_16-FSM.o mac/mac-802_16-timers.o \
5) In the terminal, cd ns-2.28 and then typed ./configure
6) Next I typed, make clean. It gave me the below error:
xyz@xyz-Presario-V3000-GN367PA-ACJ:~/ns-allinone-2.28/ns-2.28$ make clean
Makefile:228: *** commands commence before first target. Stop.
How do I correct this? It is indicating the highlighted line above which I added in the Makefile!!!
Last edited by priya86mohanty; 05-06-2012 at 05:30 AM.
Oh yes, I had not typed ./configure after removing the <space> after '\'. I directly typed make clean and that is how I was getting the error. It is working now. Thanks!!!
Last edited by priya86mohanty; 05-06-2012 at 05:54 AM.
When I typed the 'nam' - xyz@xyz-Presario-V3000-GN367PA-ACJ:~/ns-allinone-2.28/nam-1.11$ nam
In the nam window it shows the following:
NAM - The Network Animator
Welcome to Nam 1.15
Developed by UCB and the VINT, SAMAN, and Conser projects at ISI.
Nam contains source code with the following copyrights:
Copyright (c) 1991-1994 Regents of the University of California.
Copyright (c) 1997-1999 University of Southern California
Copyright (c) 2000-2002 USC/Information Sciences Institute
Why does it show Nam 1.15, when the required one is nam-1.11?
Distribution: PCLinuxOS2023 Fedora38 + 50+ other Linux OS, for test only.
Posts: 17,511
Rep:
# 44
NAM is a separate application. Any nam can be used.
( Looks like you installed with 'sudo apt-get install nam'
.. or have a 'nam' from an ns-allinone-2.35 install.)
Testing nam-1.11 in ns-allinone-2.28/nam-1.11/ :
The command is not nam but ./nam
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.