Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
02-24-2005, 10:52 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1
Posts: 13
Rep:
|
Please tell me why.............?
I think I finally got things the way I wanted in Mandrake 10.1. After I ran easy_urpmi, I tried to run urpmi --auto-select (is that even necessary?) and got this:
[root@ilegheri gian]# urpmi --auto-select
To satisfy dependencies, the following 2 packages are going to be installed (3 MB):
perl-URPM-1.03-2.1.101mdk.i586
urpmi-4.5-29.1.101mdk.noarch
Is this OK? (Y/n) y
The following packages have bad signatures:
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/perl-URPM-1.03-2.1.101mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid signature (sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG#22458a98 NOT OK)
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/urpmi-4.5-29.1.101mdk.noarch.rpm: Invalid signature (sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG#22458a98 NOT OK)
Do you want to continue installation ? (y/N) n
Does that mean there is no way to update those signatures? If I don't I'm sure that will come back and bite me? Or am I missing something only a Newbie would miss?
Thank you all
NEW2MDK
|
|
|
02-24-2005, 11:01 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slack
Posts: 122
Rep:
|
All it means is that you can't verify the package is authentic becuase you don't have the authors pgp signatures in your database. So you would have to get GPG#22458a98 and GPG#22458a98 from a key server to authenticate the packages. Just search fro gpg key server on google. It's actually not that big a deal, you could just ignore it and it won't hurt you at all. I prefer to do md5sum on my files as authenication is easier, but Mandrake like the pgp mehtod.
|
|
|
02-24-2005, 11:16 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slack
Posts: 122
Rep:
|
By the way ounce you have the key you can do a "pgp -import whatever" to put it in your database. More info can be found by "man gpg". Right now you have no keys "pgp --list-keys" will return nothing becuase you have none. There is also ways to automate the whole thing by editing some file and giving it the address of a keyserver and crap and build a keyring and on and on, but I rarely use gpg.
|
|
|
02-25-2005, 02:58 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
Sometimes that happens when urpmi can't find packages on a mirror, just update your urpmi sources if every other solution doesn't work.
|
|
|
02-25-2005, 11:57 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1
Posts: 13
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by reddazz
Sometimes that happens when urpmi can't find packages on a mirror, just update your urpmi sources if every other solution doesn't work.
|
Through here > http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/index.html it was unable to locate the two keys I need.
And reddazz, I'm not sure what you mean exactly? If you mean I run 'easy_urpmi' again I did. It told me everything already existed.
Thank you
|
|
|
02-25-2005, 02:28 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Omaha, NE, USA
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 2007
Posts: 808
Rep:
|
I believe he meant that you should run
"urpmi.update -all"
to update the hdlists for your repository mirrors.
|
|
|
02-25-2005, 04:35 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1
Posts: 13
Original Poster
Rep:
|
That allowed me to only update 'plf-free'. For some reason I'm still unable to do a urpmi --auto-select because the dependencies have bad signatures:
[root@ilegheri gian]# urpmi --auto-select
To satisfy dependencies, the following 2 packages are going to be installed (3 MB):
perl-URPM-1.03-2.1.101mdk.i586
urpmi-4.5-29.1.101mdk.noarch
Is this OK? (Y/n) y
The following packages have bad signatures:
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/perl-URPM-1.03-2.1.101mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid signature (sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG#22458a98 NOT OK)
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/urpmi-4.5-29.1.101mdk.noarch.rpm: Invalid signature (sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG#22458a98 NOT OK)
Do you want to continue installation ? (y/N) n
[root@ilegheri gian]#
thank you
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|