Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
ok so I wiped out XP and installed fedora 9 and it is slow as a slug. granted i didnt insall it into a high end pc its actaully quite the opposite. but windows never ran this slow. its a emachine with about 1.5ghz and 256RAM. any distro that is fast on this type of PC? I tried ubuntu but apparently its not compatible because I cant get past the install screen.
There are several things that you could try to do in this situation:
make fedora faster
get ubuntu to install
find another distro
Currently your preference seems to be the latter; is that correct?
256 M ram is on the low side (partic for Gnome/KDE, which are the heavyweight GUIs), but should still be at least as fast as windows. During initial startup you may have one of several processes indexing the disk and that may be a factor in how slow it seems initially.
Puppy/dsl and similar are good suggestions. Also check out live CDs (DVDs), which allow you to try things out without installing.
on a low end( speck wise) machine i would install
puppy linux , or Damn Small Linux , or even Knoppix
or a VERY striped down fedora --no kde, --no gnome , -- no Compz, and use xfce
and do not install open office with only 256 ram ( will not run fast enough to be of ANY use).
If you want Fedora, install it with nothing....no desktop, no eye candy of any kind, and maybe it will be about as peppy as XP. But Fedora doesn't give you the option to install a bare bones system, I once tried to de-select most of what it wanted to install and it still installed everything. Fedora is the biggest "PIG" I've installed as far as Linux distributions are concerned. Even Vista can out-perform Fedora as far as speed is concerned.
Debian is the fastest Linux with a robust desktop like KDE or Gnome, as long as you don't accept the default installation like Fedora or Ubuntu. With Debian you can start with a bare bones system and just add the apps and services you want while keeping a lean mean machine.
Mac OS X (Hackintosh) also runs faster than Fedora.
Red Hat is all about "Enterprise". Which means "We're looking for money, not groupies, we got enough of them and they don't pay". And Red Hat realizes that there are many business owners out there too cheap to invest in their company. To get them interested in spending the bucks in the "Enterprise", Red Hat offers their testing platform called "Fedora" for free. So what!.. if it's a little slower than the competition, it'll do the job and most every job you throw at it. And your employees won't be looking to install games to play all day because they barely have enough time to get their job done in time 'cause their using Red Hat.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.