Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
if you creat this file you can run by " bash offsetbruteforce.sh" or you can change the permission by "chmod" command by root account.
for example "chmod 777 filename".
if you creat this file you can run by " bash offsetbruteforce.sh" or you can change the permission by "chmod" command by root account.
for example "chmod 777 filename".
This is not a good practice. You should not go about recommending people change permissions to 777. Noobs who don't understand permissions yet are likely to blindly follow that advice and will then be thrilled when it works, but it is not a good solution. a better permission is probably 72-
If you want to allow all users on the system to run the script, 755 is probably the best choice, otherwise why not just make it 700 so it's only readable by the owner?
This is not a good practice. You should not go about recommending people change permissions to 777. Noobs who don't understand permissions yet are likely to blindly follow that advice and will then be thrilled when it works, but it is not a good solution. a better permission is probably 72-
There are no better or worse permissions. There are only permissions that are suitable for the intended use. For example, the only suitable permission for the /root-directory is 700, and the only suitable permission for programs in /usr/bin is 755.
Nonetheless, I agree with you that giving a solution without proper explanation is not the best way to answer to a thread.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.