Partition recommendations for SUSE 10.1 install
Hey all,
I've recently got my hands on the 10.1 ver of SuSE and was wondering if anyone could suggest a good selection of mount points/partition sizes for installing this dist. The only limitation is I have approx only 22GB available for the complete linux system, and for reference I only have a pentium 366, with 256mb RAM. Any help, suggestions, ideas would be appreciated Cheers hobbsie |
If I were you, I'd go for something like
/boot 100mb -- a seperate partition for the boot directory swap 512Mb -- twice the amount of RAM, although it could be less / rest of the space -- root partition You could also make a /home partition, on which users would store personal files, to reduce the chanses of data loss |
Thanks deftone sound like a good idea...
do you happen to know which is more important to have the larger amount of space on it / or /home?? |
Quote:
You said 22GB total for Linux--presumably that includes data. If you are dual (multi) booting, also consider having a shared data partition--this will make better use of the overall space. More details on your overall system and we can be even more creative...;) |
Quote:
C: (ntfs) 26.05GB D: (ntfs) 26.19GB Unallocated space: 22.29GB (as reported by acronis disk director suite) So what I was wanting was enough room for linux to run reasonably on my lower spec system with the ability to burn cd's, play music from my D: ntfs partition, and just generally surf the web, chat on msn/yahoo clients. Also with the ability of having a partition viewable by both OS's so I can easily transfer files from one system to another (alternatively if Read/Write access to ntfs drives is safe in SuSE then that would be great option) Thats about as detailed as I can be as I'm still not 100% as to exactly what I want to do fully with SuSE until i get into it a bit more. Cheers hobbsie |
Quote:
This question is only relevent if you plan to have a seperate partition for /home (instead of just a subdirectory under /). Since you've asked the question above, I'm assuming you don't really know how you'll be using your system. And with no plans for what the future holds, fixed partitions will probably come back to bite you later. It's pretty much impossible to guess what you'll need ahead of time if you don't know what you'll be doing! Two ways out of this dilemma. Either give up on the partitioning and shove everything under /, or go with LVM. For a new user on a home system, going with nothing but a swap partition and a / partition is simple and easy. For the more adventurous who want added flexibility and aren't scared off by a little more complexity, LVM is the way to go. You may do better with just the bare minimum , / and swap, if you can't complete the following sentence: "I need multiple partitions BECAUSE..." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What you will lose with only one big partition however, is a bit of encapsulation and recovery. Say you were downloading some humongous file with only a single / partition. If you ran yourself out of space with that download, your whole OS may crash. Whereas if you had a seperate partition you were downloading to, you'd fill up that particular partition but your OS would not be affected. Similar concepts for backup/recovery or installation of a different Linux distro. It's easier to backup and restore smaller chunks of data. If you have /home on a seperate partition, you could replace Suse with Debian and still leave your /home intact after the move. But if everything were on one big partition - OS and /home - then you'd have to replace it all to change distros. After the above explanation, one might wonder why would anybody NOT partition? The answer is simplicity. Add to that the fact that you are only dealing with 22Gb of disk space. Worst case, if you decided to change distros with only a / partition, you could backup everything you have on only 5 DVD's, and then retore the parts you need from those backups. Things would get a bit hairier if you were dealing with 500Gb of data for a distro switch! p.s. - Based on my thoughts above, you probably think I don't partition much myself. Wrong! Many would consider me to be obsessive to the point of ridiculousness! Look below to see the pretty complex setup I have (for a home system!) Code:
# fdisk -l |
Quote:
Here's a pretty good description of what LVM is: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/...flvmsmall.html Here's a link to the entire document that contains the above chapter: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ |
Well haertig all i can say is WOW on your own personal partition table. I've already managed to get totally disorganised upgrading from 10GB to 80GB and thats with only 2 win partitions...how do you keep track of it all LOL
And thanks heaps for such a good detailed reply. I have finally bit the bullet and as I am writing this I'm using SuSE 10.1 with firefox, I chose to let SUSE manage the partitions and this is my partition table: Code:
/dev/hda 74.5GB WDC-WD800JB-00JJC0 Once again thanks to all for your advice and help, I'll remember to come back here anytime i have even a silly question. Cheers hobbsie |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM. |