Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I love Linux. I'm looking for an excuse to install Linux...
I've installed Ubuntu 8.10 on a separate partition, and installed Xfce (to replace Gnome). Unfortunately, even with the light-weight window manager, Xfce, Linux still runs significantly slower than Windows 98 (at least 5x slower). It boots slower, it shuts down slower, the window manager loads slower, every application imaginable opens slower -- including the terminal. I'm thinking of replacing Ubuntu with Slackware (since it has a magical place in my heart), but if I'm not going to get a significant increase in speed over Win98, it's really not worth my time, as I'm only using Linux for testing my wxWidget projects on another platform.
Does anyone think Slackware is going to run "better" than Windows 98?
Yeah, AFAIK Ubuntu's focus favors usability over speed. My guess is you can configure a substantially quicker $foo_distro system (where foo_distro='slackware', sure).
Xfce is not all that light. Instead, give LXDE a shot -- or just a WM like IceWM...
Before completely switching distros, just ditch the desktop environment. xfce may ligher than gnome, but that is a bit like saying Asia elephants are lighter than African elephants.
Just use a light window manager. For example fvwm or openbox. Also make sure you disable or uninstall all the deamons that you don't need.
If you find that you can't get ubuntu to run fast enough try one of the distros that is really designed to run on older harder. For example I've heard good things about slitaz.
Ah, I was under the impression that Xfce was light. I'll just use Fluxbox or IceWM then. Thank you! =) I'll post back here after I go through the installation and get everything set up.
You are not saying what kind of hardware you are testing, though. We can't really tell you what should you be using when we have no idea what kind of processing power are you using.
Windows 98 is an OS from, well, 1998. You are testing OSes that are from 2009/2010 on (probably) very old hardware, which will require -no doubt- a very careful selection of the software you are going to use. Ubuntu, Slackware or fooLinux will not matter if you continue to use xfce, firefox 3.x and thunderbird, since you will be swapping to disk since the middle of the boot process, and until your box has switched off.
Probably more ram will help with that, but, as said, I can only guess when I have no idea what kind of hardware we are talking about.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.